Patient-Reported Outcomes in Performance Measurement.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Research Triangle Park, NC :
RTI International / RTI Press,
2015.
|
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Series: | RTI Press Publication
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Click to View |
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Table 1. Definitions and key concepts for patient-reported outcomes and measures
- Table 2. Main characteristics of patient-reported outcomes
- Table 3. PRO methods: characteristics, strengths, and limitations
- Table 4. Primary criteria for evaluating and selecting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in performance measurement
- Figure 1. Types of respondent sources of data and modes and methods of administration
- Introduction
- The National Quality Forum Project
- Concepts and Definitions
- Types of Patient-Reported Outcomes
- Health-Related Quality of Life
- Functional Status
- Symptoms and Symptom Burden
- Health Behaviors
- Patient Experience of Care
- Method and Mode of Administration, Data Collection, and Analysis
- Modes and Methods Issues
- Mode: Self-Administration Versus Interviewer Administration
- Method of Administration
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Clinical Setting
- Scoring: Classical Test Theory Versus Modern Test Theory
- Linking or Cross-Talk Between Different Measures of the Same Construct
- Addressing Barriers to Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement
- Vulnerable Populations
- Literacy
- Language and Culture
- Functional Abilities
- Response Shift, Adaptation, and Other Challenges to Detecting True Change
- Implications of the Different Methods and Modes for Response Rate, Reliability, and Validity
- Implementing Data Collection Methods
- Using Different Method or Mode Than the One Originally Validated
- Using Multiple Methods and Modes
- Accounting for the Impact of Nonresponders
- Selection of Patient-Level PROMs
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
- Attributes of PROMs
- Important Differences in PROM Attributes
- Instrument Length
- Implications of PRO Data for Action
- History of Successful Use of PROMs.
- Documentation of Particular Attributes of PROMs
- PROM Characteristics for Consideration
- Generic Versus Condition-Specific Measures
- Measurement Precision
- Sensitivity to Change, or Responsiveness
- Minimally Important Differences
- Essential Conditions to Integrate PROMs Into the Electronic Health Record
- General Considerations for Health Information Technology
- Examples of PROMs in Electronic Health Record Applications
- Selection of PROMs That Meet Recommended Characteristics for Use in Performance Measures
- Conclusions
- References
- Acknowledgments
- About the Authors.