Reading Fluency Measurements in EFA FTI Partner Countries : Outcomes and Improvement Prospects
Students in lower-income countries often acquire limited literacy in school and often drop out illiterate. For those who stay, the problem is not detected until it is too late to intervene. Oral reading fluency tests given in the early grades can q...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/925221468179361979/Reading-fluency-measurements-in-EFA-FTI-partner-countries-outcomes-and-improvement-prospects http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26822 |
Summary: | Students in lower-income countries often
acquire limited literacy in school and often drop out
illiterate. For those who stay, the problem is not detected
until it is too late to intervene. Oral reading fluency
tests given in the early grades can quickly and
inexpensively assess student literacy. For this reason,
one-minute reading studies have been popular. A search
carried out in early 2010 showed that over 50 fluency
studies have been conducted in various countries, and that
norms have been established in the U.S., Mexico, and Chile.
The studies often reported data in ways that were not easily
comparable, and few had collected nationally representative
data. However, the findings consistently showed very limited
achievement. A multi-country study matching reading and
instructional time data showed that the deficits are largely
due to limited reading practice. The findings also suggest
that few governments have taken action to improve reading
outcomes on the basis of test scores. However, a number of
pilot reading programs that emphasized phonics and practice
were financed by donors and implemented by Non-Governmental
Organizations (NGOs). These brought about substantial
improvements within a few months. Their success suggests
that it is eminently feasible to raise student outcomes
significantly through evidence based reading methods.
Overall, the oral reading fluency tests have shown good
psychometric properties, although reading achievement
typically shows much variability within classes and sampling
procedures could improve. Cross-linguistic comparability is
rough and approximate, but overall it is possible to monitor
reading outcomes across time and countries. |
---|