Defining, Measuring, and Benchmarking Administrative Expenditures of Mandatory Social Security Programs
This study provides a framework for comparison and benchmarking of administrative expenditures of public and private social security programs. The paper presents the genesis of the inquiries into the subject, reviewing some of the most relevant lit...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/02/24193182/defining-measuring-benchmarking-administrative-expenditures-mandatory-social-security-programs http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21789 |
| Summary: | This study provides a framework for
comparison and benchmarking of administrative expenditures
of public and private social security programs. The paper
presents the genesis of the inquiries into the subject,
reviewing some of the most relevant literature on
administrative expenditures and the costs of mandatory
programs produced over the past two decades. The
quantitative analysis builds on the extensive body of
literature, but our framework evolved considerably from
earlier studies. Our dataset includes over 100 observations
and a broad set of explanatory variables. The authors
developed and compared a number of standardized cost indices
discussing their advantages and limitations. The author also
discusses major cost components and their shares in total
program costs. The analysis explains over 90 percent of
variation in administrative expenditures. It confirms some
of the hypotheses expressed in the earlier studies and
presents new evidence of driving factors for costs. The
author developed three different specifications for
statistical analysis. The first set looks at the impact of
design of a program on total costs. The second group of
specifications assesses differences in costs of managing
pension liabilities between the public and private mandatory
pension schemes. Finally, on the basis of the third model
the author generate benchmarks for staffing levels and for
the total administrative expenditures. The author compares
those to the actual indicators and develops standard
performance ratios, providing insights into design
variations and performance of the programs. The author
concludes with a discussion of data limitations and
implications of our findings. |
|---|