Populist Fiscal Policy
Political economy explanations for fiscal profligacy are dominated by models of bargaining among organized interest groups over group-specific targeted benefits financed by generalized taxation. These models predict that governments consisting of a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/10/9972031/populist-fiscal-policy http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6893 |
Summary: | Political economy explanations for
fiscal profligacy are dominated by models of bargaining
among organized interest groups over group-specific targeted
benefits financed by generalized taxation. These models
predict that governments consisting of a coalition of
political parties spend more than single-party regimes. This
paper presents an alternative model-that of populist
pressure on political parties to spend more on the general
public good, financed by costly income taxation-and obtains
the opposite prediction. According to this model, public
spending and taxes are lower under coalition governments
that can win elections more cheaply. Indeed, in order to win
elections, coalition partners need to satisfy a smaller
share of swing voters than does a single-party government
that enjoys narrower support from its core constituency. A
coalition government therefore spends less on the public
good to capture the share of the swing vote necessary for
re-election. Using data from more than 70 countries during
the period 1970-2006, the paper provides robust supporting
evidence for this alternative model. |
---|