How Does Bribery Affect Public Service Delivery? Micro-Evidence from Service Users and Public Officials in Peru
When seeking a public service, users may be required to pay in bribes more than the official price. Consequently, some users may be discouraged and choose not to seek a service due to the higher price imposed by the bribery "tax." This p...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/01/8968936/bribery-affect-public-service-delivery-micro-evidence-service-users-public-officials-peru http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6476 |
| Summary: | When seeking a public service, users may
be required to pay in bribes more than the official price.
Consequently, some users may be discouraged and choose not
to seek a service due to the higher price imposed by the
bribery "tax." This paper explores the price and
quantity components of the relationship between governance
and service delivery using micro-level survey data. The
authors construct new measures of governance using data from
users of public services from 13 government agencies in
Peru. For some basic services, low-income users pay a
larger share of their income than wealthier ones do; that
is, the bribery tax is regressive. Where there are
substitute private providers, low-income users appear to be
discouraged more often and not to seek basic services.
Thus, bribery may penalize poorer users twice - acting as a
regressive tax and discouraging access to basic services.
The paper explores the characteristics of households seeking
public services. Higher education and age are associated
with higher probability of being discouraged. Trust in state
institutions decreases the probability of being discouraged,
while knowledge of mechanisms to report corruption and
extent of social network increase it, suggesting that
households may rely on substitutes through networks. The
study complements the household analysis with supply-side
analysis based on data from public officials, and constructs
agency-level measures for access to public services and
institutional factors. Econometric results suggest that
corruption reduces the supply of services, while voice
mechanisms and clarity of the public agency's mission
increase it. |
|---|