Social Health Insurance vs. Tax-Financed Health Systems—Evidence from the OECD
This paper exploits the transitions between tax-financed health care and social health insurance in the OECD countries over the period 1960-2006 to assess the effects of adopting social health insurance over tax finance on per capita health spendin...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20090121101737 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4018 |
Summary: | This paper exploits the transitions
between tax-financed health care and social health insurance
in the OECD countries over the period 1960-2006 to assess
the effects of adopting social health insurance over tax
finance on per capita health spending, amenable mortality,
and labor market outcomes. The paper uses regression-based
generalizations of difference-in-differences and
instrumental variables to address the possible endogeneity
of a country's health system. It finds that adopting
social health insurance in preference to tax financing
increases per capita health spending by 3-4 percent, reduces
the formal sector share of employment by 8-10 percent, and
reduces total employment by as much as 6 percent. For the
most part, social health insurance adoption has no
significant impact on amenable mortality, but for one
cause-breast cancer among women-social health insurance
systems perform significantly worse, with 5-6 percent more
potential years of life lost. |
---|