Cash or Condition? Evidence from a Cash Transfer Experiment
Conditional Cash Transfer programs are "...the world's favorite new anti-poverty device," (The Economist, July 29 2010) yet little is known about the specific role of the conditions in driving their success. In this paper, we evaluat...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20101213164231 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3988 |
Summary: | Conditional Cash Transfer programs are
"...the world's favorite new anti-poverty
device," (The Economist, July 29 2010) yet little is
known about the specific role of the conditions in driving
their success. In this paper, we evaluate a unique cash
transfer experiment targeted at adolescent girls in Malawi
that featured both a conditional (CCT) and an unconditional
(UCT) treatment arm. We find that while there was a modest
improvement in school enrollment in the UCT arm in
comparison to the control group, this increase is only 43
percent as large as the CCT arm. The CCT arm also
outperformed the UCT arm in tests of English reading
comprehension. The schooling condition, however, proved
costly for important non-schooling outcomes: teenage
pregnancy and marriage rates were substantially higher in
the CCT than the UCT arm. Our findings suggest that a CCT
program for early adolescents that transitions into a UCT
for older teenagers would minimize this trade-off by
improving schooling outcomes while avoiding the adverse
impacts of conditionality on teenage pregnancy and marriage. |
---|