Sharing Responsibility through Joint Decision Making and Implications for Intimate-Partner Violence : Evidence from 12 Sub-Saharan African Countries
Intimate partner violence affects 36 percent of women in Sub-Saharan Africa. This paper examines the relationship between decision making within couples and the incidence of intimate partner violence across 12 African countries. Using the wife’s re...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/undefined/255851630330267060/Sharing-Responsibility-through-Joint-Decision-Making-and-Implications-for-Intimate-Partner-Violence-Evidence-from-12-Sub-Saharan-African-Countries http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36225 |
Summary: | Intimate partner violence affects 36
percent of women in Sub-Saharan Africa. This paper examines
the relationship between decision making within couples and
the incidence of intimate partner violence across 12 African
countries. Using the wife’s responses to survey questions,
the analysis finds that compared with joint decision making,
sole decision making by the husband is associated with a 3.3
percentage point higher incidence of physical intimate
partner violence in the last year, while sole decision
making by the wife is associated with a 10 percentage point
higher incidence. Similar patterns hold for emotional and
sexual violence. When the husband’s report of decision
making is included in the analysis, joint decision making
emerges as protective only when spouses agree that decisions
are made jointly. Notably, agreement on joint decision
making is associated with lower intimate partner violence
than agreement on decision making by the husband. Constructs
undergirding common intimate partner violence theories,
namely attitudes toward violence, similarity of preferences,
marital capital, and bargaining, do not explain the
relationship. The results are instead consistent with joint
decision making as a mechanism that allows spouses to share
responsibility and mitigate conflict if the decision is
later regretted. |
---|