Indonesia : Long-Term Generasi Qualitative Study
In 2007, the government of Indonesia (GoI) introduced PNPM Generasi (National Community Empowerment Program—Healthy and Smart Generation, Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat—Generasi Sehat dan Cerdas) to address key policy priorities and the M...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
World Bank, Jakarta
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/102101542808714703/Indonesia-Long-Term-Generasi-Qualitative-Study http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31010 |
| Summary: | In 2007, the government of Indonesia
(GoI) introduced PNPM Generasi (National Community
Empowerment Program—Healthy and Smart Generation, Program
Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat—Generasi Sehat dan Cerdas)
to address key policy priorities and the Millennium
Development Goals—reducing poverty, maternal mortality, and
child mortality, as well as ensuring universal coverage of
basic education. To facilitate a rigorous evaluation of the
program, GoI (working with the World Bank and the Abdul
Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab) randomly assigned Generasi
locations for the pilot phase (2007–2009). A randomized
evaluation of two different versions of the program (with
and without performance bonuses) was conducted in three
rounds (Wave I at baseline, Wave II eighteen months after
implementation, and Wave III thirty months after
implementation). In 2016-2017, the impact evaluation (IE)
team fielded a follow-up survey in the same subdistricts as
the first three waves. A separate report analyzes the
quantitative findings of this final survey. During the final
survey round, the IE team also collected qualitative data in
geographically distinct treatment and control communities to
explore two problems:1) first, whether Generasi’s three
components—facilitation, community participation, and the
target and performance bonus system—functioning as intended;
second, what is the program’s long-term impact on village
governance and service delivery, and how it can influence
Village Law implementation |
|---|