Impact Evaluations in Agriculture : An Assessment of the Evidence
This report seizes the opportunity to learn from existing evidence by analyzing lessons derived from impact evaluations produced between 2000 and January 2009 to begin to discern what has been effective in agriculture. It is part of a broader effor...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC: World Bank
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/131051468161681356/Impact-evaluations-in-agriculture-an-assessment-of-the-evidence http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27794 |
Summary: | This report seizes the opportunity to
learn from existing evidence by analyzing lessons derived
from impact evaluations produced between 2000 and January
2009 to begin to discern what has been effective in
agriculture. It is part of a broader effort being undertaken
by the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) of the World Bank
to understand how impact evaluations can help improve
performance and broadly disseminate those lessons.
Specifically, the report has three objectives: 1) assess the
current state of impact evaluations in the agriculture
sector and highlight challenges that users face when trying
to answer what works best in the sector; 2) derive a
taxonomy of agriculture interventions evaluated using impact
evaluation methodology, and identify the most common
constraints for farmers and addressed by those
interventions; and 3) highlight what can be said about the
impact of different interventions on agricultural outcomes
(focusing on productivity and farm income). Also, point to
areas for future research of agricultural interventions to
broaden the use of this analysis. The rest of this chapter
provides some necessary definitions for the report, outlines
the conceptual framework, and presents a brief background on
the selection of impact evaluations (IEs) from the
evaluation literature. Chapter two provides a profile of the
evidence, including IE characteristics and challenges
encountered in the analysis. Chapter three looks within the
interventions and presents a formal taxonomy of all
agricultural interventions represented in the group analyzed
for the report. Chapter four delves into the evidence by
presenting the primary constraints dealt with in the
interventions, the results reported by the evaluations, and
some lessons that may be incorporated into future project
design. Chapter five concludes with some general remarks. |
---|