The Art and Science of Benefit Sharing in the Natural Resource Sector
The purpose of this paper is to contribute to theunderstanding and discussion of how the costs andbenefits of natural resource development are sharedacross society. This paper presents how IFC, as both aninvestor and a development organization, det...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/06/26514200/art-science-benefit-sharing-natural-resource-sector-discussion-paper http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24793 |
Summary: | The purpose of this paper is to
contribute to theunderstanding and discussion of how the
costs andbenefits of natural resource development are
sharedacross society. This paper presents how IFC, as both
aninvestor and a development organization, determineswhether
benefits and costs are shared reasonably, and how this
assessment influences IFC’s decision to invest ina
particular natural resource project. the goal of the paper
is to promotea broad, constructive dialogue across
stakeholders—governments, investors, civil society, and
others—around benefit sharing. The paper draws on IFC’s
experience and presents anoverarching framework for
multi-stakeholder benefitsharing, providing analysis and
guidance for a range ofcomplex topics. The paper is intended
to provide entrypoints for stakeholders of varying levels of
familiarity with the issues to benefit-sharing assessment.
The paper is not a definitive manual for all the issues
coveredfor which more detailed, high-quality and
excellentreferences and literature exists. This paper is
organized along these broad areas of impact that IFC
considers in the benefit sharing assessment:fiscal,
economic, environmental, and social. The approaches IFC uses
to evaluate benefit sharing arepresented in each area, along
with some lessons learned. This is complemented by a
discussion of key issues thatare topical in the field. Each
chapter opens with a list of questions that can be used as a
guide to assess the potential benefits and costs of an
investment. As a result, there is a spectrum of what can be
considered reasonable overall. However, there may be
particular features of a benefit-sharing arrangement that
stand out and can signal a risk to its legitimacy. Our
aspiration is that this paper will complement as well as
stimulate work by others that can enhance the collective
knowledge and encourage dialogue. |
---|