Moldova Trade Study : Note 2. Is the DCFTA Good for Moldova? Analysis of Moldova’s Trade Options Using a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Model
Moldova’s recent Association Agreement with the European Union (EU), which includes a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA), represents an important opportunity, as well as challenges. This analytical document has been commissioned by...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/03/26075964/dcfta-good-moldova-analysis-moldova’s-trade-options-using-dynamic-computable-general-equilibrium-model http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24043 |
Summary: | Moldova’s recent Association Agreement
with the European Union (EU), which includes a Deep and
Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA), represents an
important opportunity, as well as challenges. This
analytical document has been commissioned by the World Bank
Group to provide insights into potential outcomes of the
DCFTA and of other trade options that Moldova has, using a
Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (DCGE) model
calibrated to its economy. This paper begins by describing
the general trends in economic relations between Moldova and
the EU over the past 10 years, with an emphasis on trade, as
well as Foreign direct investment (FDI) and labor migration.
This section includes some additional facts and details that
complement the Trade Competitiveness Diagnostic. In the
second section, the paper presents the main elements of the
DCFTA and highlights the trade commitments and concessions
that the EU and Moldova undertook. It also includes a short
review of available literature on the ex-ante or ex post
impact assessments of other Association Agreements between
the EU and third countries that have been done using CGE
models. The third section presents key features of the DCGE
and discusses the data used for assembling the Social
Accounting Matrix (SAM). Then, the main features of the
simulated trade scenarios are presented. Finally, this paper
discusses the DCGE simulation results, including the effects
of the various scenarios on welfare, trade, and economic
activity level. Some distributional impacts are also brought
into discussion. The final section concludes and makes
several recommendations. |
---|