Preferences, Purchasing Power Parity, and Inequality : Analytical Framework, Propositions, and Empirical Evidence
This paper makes analytical, methodological and empirical contributions to the literature on purchasing power parity. Purchasing power parities are required in a host of cross-country welfare comparisons, such as poverty rates and gross domestic pr...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/08/24921639/preferences-purchasing-power-parity-inequality-analytical-framework-propositions-empirical-evidence http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22650 |
Summary: | This paper makes analytical,
methodological and empirical contributions to the literature
on purchasing power parity. Purchasing power parities are
required in a host of cross-country welfare comparisons,
such as poverty rates and gross domestic product. The
subject has recently generated much interest in the wake of
the release of the final results of the 2011 International
Comparison Program. This paper introduces a preference-based
analytical framework that departs from the conventional
Balassa-Samuelson framework in deriving empirically
verifiable propositions on the link between purchasing power
parity and exchange rates, and between purchasing power
parity and inequality. The paper also provides an
alternative methodology for calculating purchasing power
parities that are benchmarked against the 2011 International
Comparison Program purchasing power parities. As this study
shows, the alternative methodology is capable of easy
implementation on readily available data sets. The
benchmarking exercise suggests that the 2011 International
Comparison Program generally understates purchasing power
parity and overstates gross domestic product, and that the
purchasing power parities vary across expenditure
percentiles. The study reports regional variation in the
direction of the difference between the two purchasing power
parities. The empirical evidence is supportive of the
positive association between inequality and purchasing power
parity derived in the paper. |
---|