Impact and Implications of Recent and Potential Changes to Brazil's Subnational Fiscal Framework
Brazil's subnational fiscal framework has remained a source of unabated controversy despite its relative stability over the past decade. The objective of this study is to evaluate the nature and impact of recent and expected changes to Brazil&...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/09/18423427/impact-implications-recent-potential-changes-brazils-subnational-fiscal-framework http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20773 |
Summary: | Brazil's subnational fiscal
framework has remained a source of unabated controversy
despite its relative stability over the past decade. The
objective of this study is to evaluate the nature and impact
of recent and expected changes to Brazil's subnational
fiscal framework in light of these debates. More
specifically, this work has focused on recent and proposed
changes to: 1) the Tax on Goods Circulation, Communication
and Inter-municipal and Inter-state Transportation Services
(ICMS); 2) the State Participation Fund (FPE) as well as the
transfers from oil and mining royalties; and 3) the
subnational debt and borrowing framework. These three broad
areas are precisely the ones that are the center of the
current debate on Brazil's subnational fiscal
framework. In order to achieve the proposed objective, three
background papers were commissioned, each covering one of
the issues outlined above. The main value-added of this
study is an examination-and an attempt at a quantification
of the impacts of the changes underway in these three
dimensions of Brazil's intergovernmental fiscal
framework. The remainder of this synthesis report is
organized as follows. Section two provides a brief overview
of how Brazil's subnational fiscal framework currently
works. Section three describes the ongoing efforts to reform
Brazil's subnational fiscal framework and points to the
advantages of a more coordinated approach over a piecemeal
one. Section four discusses the expected fiscal impact on
subnational governments of the most likely reform scenarios.
Section five concludes. Finally, the amended proposal also
kept the original provisions regarding the validation of
past tax incentives unchanged. It included a mandate for
past tax incentives to be approved by state legislative and
to be disclosed at the official Gazette. The main change was
the creation of a provision to safeguard the existing tax
incentives until their expiration or 2033, whichever comes first. |
---|