Job Creation in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations
This paper presents a comprehensive review of the operations that the World Bank has supported to create jobs and promote employment in fragile and conflict-affected situations. A novel approach to identifying projects is presented that enables sea...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank Group, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/10/20342854/job-creation-fragile-conflict-affected-situations http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20637 |
Summary: | This paper presents a comprehensive
review of the operations that the World Bank has supported
to create jobs and promote employment in fragile and
conflict-affected situations. A novel approach to
identifying projects is presented that enables searching for
projects based on stated development objectives, regardless
of the sector of the project. Of a sample of 2,166 projects
funded by the International Development Association, this
resulted in the identification of 98 projects that have
specific job creation and employment generation development
objectives. Among these projects, 51 percent of countries
appearing on the list between 2004 and 2012 have implemented
projects. Detailed textual analysis is carried out on the
project descriptions and indicators to evaluate how well
projects are aligned to the context. The results suggest
there is a lack of measurement on outcomes that are
particularly relevant for fragile and conflict-affected
situations, such as the development of social cohesion,
reintegration of those involved or affected by violence,
impacts jobs have on the willingness to engage in violence
or conflict, perceptions of government accountability, and
equitable access to these economic opportunities.
Quantitative analysis of the portfolio indicates that there
are also systematic differences in the size and resources
associated with job creation projects in countries with
fragile and conflict-affected situations relative to similar
projects in other International Development
Association-borrowing countries. Given the mixed empirical
evidence on the relationship between jobs and conflict, this
report calls for more methodological measurement of the
impacts of these programs on stabilization outcomes in the future. |
---|