Implicit Pension Debt, Transition Cost, Options, and Impact of China's Pension Reform : A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis
The main problems with China's pension system--the pension burdens of state enterprises and the agency of the population--have deepened in recent years. Using a new computable general equilibrium model that differentiates between three types o...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/02/1003174/implicit-pension-debt-transition-cost-options-impact-chinas-pension-reform-computable-general-equilibrium-analysis http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19708 |
Summary: | The main problems with China's
pension system--the pension burdens of state enterprises and
the agency of the population--have deepened in recent years.
Using a new computable general equilibrium model that
differentiates between three types of enterprise ownership
and 22 groups in the labor force, the authors estimate the
effects of pension reform in China, comparing various
options for financing the transition cost. They examine the
impact that various reform options would have on the
system's sustainability, on overall economic growth,
and on income distribution. The results are promising. The
current pay-as-you-go system, with a notional individual
account, remains unchanged in the first scenario examined.
Simulations show this system to be unsustainable. Expanding
coverage under this system would improve financial viability
in the short run but weaken it in the long run. Other
scenarios assume that the transition cost will be financed
by various taxes and that a new, fully funded individual
account will be established in 2001. The authors compare the
impact of a corporate tax, a value-added tax, a personal
income tax, and a consumption tax. They estimate the annual
transition cost to be about 0.6 percent of Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) between 2000 and 2010, declining to 0.3
percent by 2050. Using a personal income tax to finance the
transition cost would best promote economic growth and
reduce income inequality. Levying a social security tax and
injecting fiscal resources to finance the transition costs
would help make the reformed public pillar sustainable. To
finance a benefit of 20 percent of the average wage, a
contribution rate of only 10 percent-12.5 percent would be
enough to balance the basic pension pillar. Gradually
increasing the retirement age would further reduce the
contribution rate. |
---|