Stock Market Responses to Bank Restructuring Policies during the East Asian Crisis
The East Asian crisis began in Thailand in mid-1997 when an ailing financial sector, a slowdown in exports, and large increases in central bank credit to weak financial institutions, triggered a run on the baht. Then the crisis spread to other coun...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/03/1047482/stock-market-responses-bank-restructuring-policies-during-east-asian-crisis http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19689 |
Summary: | The East Asian crisis began in Thailand
in mid-1997 when an ailing financial sector, a slowdown in
exports, and large increases in central bank credit to weak
financial institutions, triggered a run on the baht. Then
the crisis spread to other countries in the region, as
common vulnerabilities, and revaluations of risk in emerging
markets, triggered large capital flows. To better understand
the impact of different policy responses to financial
crises, the authors investigate how stock markets in East
Asian countries reacted to the initial policy announcements
of bank, and financial restructuring - especially how
banking, and non-financial sectors in Indonesia, the
Republic of Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand, fared in response
to announcements of different restructuring measures. They
find that prices of bank stocks, responded positively to
announcements about government guarantees of bank
liabilities. Non-financial companies gained in value when
guarantees were announced, but their stock prices were
negatively affected by announcements favoring public
re-capitalization schemes, and generous liquidity support
programs. Possibly the market was concerned that public
funds per se, would not restore the health of the financial
sector - that they would not be sufficient, or would not be
used to restructure bank balance sheets, and operations, and
allow banks to engage in meaningful corporate restructuring.
The announcements of increased public support, have been
viewed as a signal that the financial institutions were in a
financially weaker position than previously thought. |
---|