Productivity or Endowments? Sectoral Evidence for Hong Kong's Aggregate Growth
The author provides sectoral evidence that sheds new light on the current debate regarding the sources of growth of the East Asian miracle. The author tests both the productivity-driven and endowment-driven hypotheses using Hong Kong's sectora...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2002/09/2028948/productivity-endowments-sectoral-evidence-hong-kongs-aggregate-growth http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19285 |
Summary: | The author provides sectoral evidence
that sheds new light on the current debate regarding the
sources of growth of the East Asian miracle. The author
tests both the productivity-driven and endowment-driven
hypotheses using Hong Kong's sectoral data. The results
show that most of the growth in the services sector is
driven by the rapidly accumulating capital endowments, and
not by productivity growth. In addition, productivity growth
in the manufacturing sector is also unimpressive. The
manufacturing sector is more labor intensive and its growth
is hindered by the reallocation of resources into the
services sector as a result of the growth of capital
endowments and imports. Overall, sectoral evidence supports
the endowment-driven hypothesis for Hong Kong's
aggregate growth. |
---|