Comment on 'Counting the World's Poor' by Angus Deaton
Deaton s analysis of the problems with poverty counts and suggestions for improvement, including issues needing further research, are based on two distinct stages in counting the poor. At the first or international stage, a world poverty line is se...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC: World Bank
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/09/17580166/comment-counting-worlds-poor-angus-deaton http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17132 |
Summary: | Deaton s analysis of the problems with
poverty counts and suggestions for improvement, including
issues needing further research, are based on two distinct
stages in counting the poor. At the first or international
stage, a world poverty line is set and used to derive
comparable poverty lines for each country. At the second or
domestic stage, the poverty lines are used to count the
number of poor people in each country, and the others are
added up over countries. He finds disquieting evidence about
both stages of counting. The data for poverty counts in the
second stage come from household surveys, whereas data on
aggregate economic growth are from National Accounts
Statistics (NAS). Deaton finds that in many countries there
are large and growing disparities between survey data and
national accounts so that there is no consistent empirical
basis for conclusions about the extent to which growth
reduces poverty. It is scandalous that even after nearly
half a century of pursuing national and international
programs for the eradication of mass poverty, the empirical
foundations for assessing the success or failure of the
programs and drawing lessons from them are so weak as to be
deemed nonexistent. Abandoning them and focusing on national
and subnational poverty analysis that goes beyond headcounts
will be the sensible course to follow. The author focuses
only on consumption-based poverty lines. The reason is the
challenge of defining household income in a theoretically
satisfactory manner and collecting data on income based on
that definition through household surveys in any country
(developed or developing). Deaton (1989) discusses the
difficulties in meeting the challenge. Poverty counts based
on income-based poverty lines are even more problematic than
consumption-based ones. |
---|