The Politics of Russian Enterprise Reform : Insiders, Local Governments, and the Obstacles to Restructuring

Russia and other countries in the commonwealth of independent states that have implemented voucher privatization programs have to account for the puzzling behavior of insiders manager-owners-who, in stripping assets from the firms they own, appear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Desai, Raj M., Goldberg, Itzhak
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2014
Subjects:
BID
IPO
TAX
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/01/17591979/politics-russian-enterprise-reform-insiders-local-governments-obstacles-restructuring
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16980
Description
Summary:Russia and other countries in the commonwealth of independent states that have implemented voucher privatization programs have to account for the puzzling behavior of insiders manager-owners-who, in stripping assets from the firms they own, appear to be stealing from one pocket to fill the other. This article suggests that asset stripping and the absence of restructuring result from interactions between insiders and subnational governments in a particular property rights regime, in which the ability to realize value is limited by uncertainty and illiquidity. As the central institutions that govern the Russian economy have ceded their powers to the provinces, regional and local governments have imposed a variety of distortions on enterprises to protect local employment. To disentangle these vicious circles of control, this article considers three sets of institutional changes: adjustments to the system of fiscal federalism by which subnational governments would be allowed to retain tax revenues generated locally; legal improvements in the protection of property rights; and the provision of mechanisms for restructuring and ownership transformation in insider-dominated firms. The aim of these reforms would be to change the incentives that local governments, owners, and investors face; to convince subnational governments that a more sustainable way of protecting employment lies in protecting local investment; to raise the cost of theft and corruption by insiders and local officials; and to allow investors to acquire controlling stakes in viable firms.