Dealing with GAC Issues in Project Lending : The Special Case of Fragile and Conflict-Affected States
The principal objective of the Bank's governance work should be to help develop capable and accountable states to deliver services to the poor, promote private-sector-led growth, and tackle corruption effectively. The agenda for action has bee...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/01/18699356/dealing-gac-issues-project-lending-special-case-fragile-conflict-affected-states http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16725 |
Summary: | The principal objective of the
Bank's governance work should be to help develop
capable and accountable states to deliver services to the
poor, promote private-sector-led growth, and tackle
corruption effectively. The agenda for action has been
defined, new tools and approaches have been developed, and
governance and anticorruption (GAC) issues and concerns are
increasingly being mainstreamed in the Bank's
operational work at the country, sector, and project levels.
With the introduction of the operational risk assessment
framework (ORAF), the Bank has undertaken a major effort to
improve how it manages GAC risks in the development projects
and programs it supports. This note provides
principles-based advice and guidance to task teams working
at the sector and project levels on fragile and
conflict-affected states (FCS) countries in Africa. It aims
to provide a common conceptual framework for understanding
the challenges and opportunities they face in project
design, implementation, and supervision; highlight key
lessons learned and good practice examples from others
working in this area; and suggest some topics where further
work is needed to understand and mitigate key operational
risks. A communications strategy that frames GAC issues in a
constructive way, seeks to take into account the concerns
and perspectives of all stakeholders involved, enhances the
understanding of constraints and opportunities, and
strengthens the project's incentives for improving
governance and reducing corruption. In FCS countries,
constraints are likely to include severe weaknesses in
institutional capacity; thus the project design should
include an explicit strategy and action plan for
institutional strengthening, as well as explicit, measurable
indicators of progress. |
---|