India : Orissa State Financial Accountability Assessment
The Country Assistance Strategy for India places emphasis on the need for modernizing public financial management, and accountability systems, and, undertaking such diagnostic work as necessary to help build Government's capacity for better pu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/05/4958083/india-orissa-state-financial-accountability-assessment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15687 |
Summary: | The Country Assistance Strategy for
India places emphasis on the need for modernizing public
financial management, and accountability systems, and,
undertaking such diagnostic work as necessary to help build
Government's capacity for better public sector
management, and external scrutiny. It calls for financial
accountability assessments to be carried out in all States
where programmatic adjustment loans are being prepared,
supporting reforms associated with fiscal, and fiduciary
risks management. Of India's 14 major States, Orissa
has the second lowest, per capita income, and a growth rate
of 3 percent against the national average of 5-6 percent per
annum, while statistics also show its revenue, and fiscal
deficits increased significantly over the years. The
Government of Orissa is developing a robust reform program,
reforms which on the fiscal side, are fully consistent with
recommendations for strengthening financial management, and
public accountability, as proposed in this State Financial
Accountability Assessment (SFAA) Report. This SFAA is
designed to ascertain and help mitigate the extent to which
public firms in Orissa State, are exposed to fiduciary
risks, and it further points to the need for capacity
building, in almost every significant aspect of public
financial accountability. It is reported that while the
legal/regulatory/institutional frameworks for internal
control, and internal audit compares favorably with the rest
of India, it does less so with international best practice,
and, although accounting and financial reporting rules
comply with well-established national requirements, it does
not with International Public Sector Accounting Standards
(IPSAS) for cash based accounting, and financial reporting.
Recommendations suggest to encourage the enlargement of the
role of the State Accountant General - AG - (Audit) in
following up cases of previous Audit Reports which the
Committees may not like to pursue for detailed examination;
to discuss the most recent reports of the Controller and
Auditor General (CAG) as a matter of priority; to include in
the annual confidential reports of the departmental
officers, an assessment of the quality of response to the
audit reports, and recommendations of the Committees; and,
civil society should be sensitized, and involved in the
accountability process, to achieve transparency. |
---|