Ethnic Minority Development in Vietnam : A Socioeconomic Perspective
The authors examine the latest quantitative evidence on disparities in living standards between and among different ethnic groups in Vietnam. Using data from the 1998 Vietnam Living Standards Survey and 1999 Census, they show that Kinh and Hoa (&qu...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, D.C.
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2002/05/1783728/ethnic-minority-development-vietnam-socioeconomic-perspective http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14802 |
Summary: | The authors examine the latest
quantitative evidence on disparities in living standards
between and among different ethnic groups in Vietnam. Using
data from the 1998 Vietnam Living Standards Survey and 1999
Census, they show that Kinh and Hoa ("majority")
households have substantially higher living standards than
"minority" households from Vietnam's other 52
ethnic groups. Subdividing the population into five broad
categories, the authors find that while the Kinh, Hoa,
Khmer, and Northern Highland minorities have benefited from
economic growth in the 1990s, the growth of Central Highland
minorities has stagnated. Disaggregating further, they find
that the same ethnic groups whose living standards have
risen fastest are those that have the highest school
enrollment rates, are most likely to intermarry with Kinh
partners, and are the least likely to practice a religion.
The authors then estimate and decompose a set of expenditure
regressions which show that even if minority households had
the same endowments as Kinh households, this would close no
more than a third of the gap in per capita expenditures.
While some ethnic minorities seem to be doing well with a
strategy of assimilating (both culturally and economically)
with the Kinh-Hoa majority, other groups are attempting to
integrate economically while retaining distinct cultural
identities. A third group comprising the Central Highland
minorities, including the Hmong, is largely being left
behind by the growth process. Such diversity in the
socioeconomic development experiences of the different
ethnic minorities indicates the need for similar diversity
in the policy interventions that are designed to assist them. |
---|