Peru : Restoring the Multiple Pillars of Old Age Income Security
In this report, the components of a national retirement security system are categorized - as "pillars", or as "tiers" according to their objective. This is in marked contrast to other publications that categorize the branches of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
Washington, DC
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/01/2892345/peru-restoring-multiple-pillars-old-age-income-security http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14681 |
| Summary: | In this report, the components of a
national retirement security system are categorized - as
"pillars", or as "tiers" according to
their objective. This is in marked contrast to other
publications that categorize the branches of a pension
system in accordance with who administers them (the public
or private sector); how are benefits structured
(final-salary defined benefit formula, or defined
contributions); or, their financing mechanism
(pay-as-you-go, or full funding). Thus, the term "first
pillar" or "pillar one" refers to that part
of a pension system intended to keep elderly out of poverty;
"second pillar" or "pillar two" to that
part intended to help individuals smooth consumption over
their life-cycle, i.e., to prevent a dramatic fall in income
at retirement time; and, "third pillar" or
"pillar three" to the instruments, and
institutions available on a voluntary basis for workers to
increase their income in old age. This report intends to
explore, and present policy options to extend formal
protection against old age poverty risks, at a fiscally
sustainable cost, and aims as well at restoring the multiple
pillars of formal old age income security. The report
reviews the current pillars of Peru's retirement
security system, grown weak, and by and large, has failed to
diversify the risks to old-age income. The public branch of
the "second pillar" still threatens the
Government's fiscal stance, and constrains management
of the economy. The private branch is costly, risky and
administered by a private oligopoly. The "third
pillar" of voluntary savings, and insurance instruments
is weak, costly, lacks transparency and fails to complement
benefits from the mandatory pillars. The report takes a
comprehensive approach in its analysis of Peru's
retirement security institutions, and, is divided into five
sections. Following this introduction, Section II presents
the dimensions of Peru's vulnerability to poverty in
old age, by examining the nature of the risks to income from
ageing in Peru. The section continues with a look at how
well Government administered and/or mandated pension plans
are covering these risks. Section III provides the
institutional background, reviews reforms to formal social
security institutions in the 1990's, and the progress
achieved, and, examines the serious problems remaining.
Section lV presents an analysis of proposals for reforms to
each branch of the retirement security system, while Section
V concludes by presenting policy options - some straight
forward measures, while others, deeper, more controversial
reforms - consistent with meeting the stated objective of
extending protection against poverty in old age, in a
fiscally, sustainable manner. |
|---|