Moldova : Country Financial Accountability Assessment
The overall conclusion of this report is that despite some progress in improving public financial management, the financial accountability framework in Moldova is weak and requires substantial strengthening. This has important implications for both...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/09/2824701/moldova-country-financial-accountability-assessment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14604 |
Summary: | The overall conclusion of this report is
that despite some progress in improving public financial
management, the financial accountability framework in
Moldova is weak and requires substantial strengthening. This
has important implications for both the Government and the
Bank: the Government will need to make a significant effort
over a long period of time to attend the issues identified
within this report; and the Bank cannot rely on the Moldovan
financial accountability framework to ensure that funds are
spent for intended purposes, but rather the Bank will need
to review and assess each operation's financial
management risks and arrangements on its own merit. It would
be unrealistic and impractical for the authorities to try to
simultaneously address the many recommendations in this
report. The Development Action Plan (DAP) lists and
prioritizes the main recommendations of this CFAA. The
overall responsibility for the implementation of the DAP
rests with the Ministry of Finance however the Ministry of
Economy, the Ministry of Labor, the Court of Accounts and
the National Bank of Moldova also play significant roles.
The DAP was endorsed by the National Steering Committee that
was formed specifically for the purpose of this CFAA. The
Board endorsed the CAS Progress Report in June 2002, which
provided emphasis in public sector reforms and improving
governance. The Government confirmed its commitment for
strengthening governance by adopting a comprehensive public
sector reform strategy. The strategy comprises three
elements: (i) public administration reform; (ii) public
expenditure management; and (iii) public/private interface.
The CAS Progress Report recognized that Government has made
significant progress in streamlining and improving public
expenditure management, especially in the areas of budget
execution, cash management, and debt management. |
---|