Competing Concepts of Inequality in the Globalization Debate
Differing value judgments in measuring inequality underlie the conflicting factual claims about how much poor people have shared in the economic gains from globalization. Opponents in the debate differ in the extent to which they care about relativ...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, D.C.
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/03/4073361/competing-concepts-inequality-globalization-debate http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14115 |
Summary: | Differing value judgments in measuring
inequality underlie the conflicting factual claims about how
much poor people have shared in the economic gains from
globalization. Opponents in the debate differ in the extent
to which they care about relative inequality versus absolute
inequality, vertical inequalities versus horizontal
inequalities, and whether they are consistently
individualistic in assessing the extent of inequality. The
value judgments on these issues made by both sides need
greater scrutiny if the globalization debate is to move forward. |
---|