How Different are Safeguards from Antidumping? Evidence from US Trade Policies toward Steel
Use of temporary trade barriers has proliferated across countries, industries, and even policy instruments. This paper constructs a panel of bilateral, product-level United States steel imports that are matched to a unique data set on trade policy...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/03/17408337/different-safeguards-antidumping-evidence-trade-policies-toward-steel http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13158 |
Summary: | Use of temporary trade barriers has
proliferated across countries, industries, and even policy
instruments. This paper constructs a panel of bilateral,
product-level United States steel imports that are matched
to a unique data set on trade policy exclusions that are
associated with the 2002 United States steel safeguard in
order to compare the trade impacts that result from
application of various temporary trade barrier policies over
1989-2003. The analysis finds that the trade effects of an
applied safeguard -- which is statutorily expected to follow
the principle of nondiscriminatory treatment -- can
nevertheless compare closely with the application of the
explicitly discriminatory antidumping policy. The results on
trade policy substitutability complement other recent
research on these increasingly important forms of import protection. |
---|