The Pathway to Publishing : a Guide to Quantitative Writing in the Health Sciences.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luby, Stephen.
Other Authors: Southern, Dorothy L.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cham : Springer International Publishing AG, 2022.
Edition:1st ed.
Subjects:
Online Access:Click to View
Table of Contents:
  • Intro
  • Preface
  • Acknowledgments
  • Contents
  • Part I: Introduction
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
  • 1.1 The Pathway to Publishing
  • 1.2 Think-Before-You-Write Approach
  • 1.2.1 Develop a Framing Document
  • 1.2.2 Focus on the High-Level Outline
  • 1.2.3 Use the "Most Common Errors"
  • 1.2.4 Understand Authorship and Mentoring Responsibilities
  • 1.2.5 Structure the Writing and Feedback Process
  • 1.2.6 Responding to Co-author Comments
  • 1.2.7 Summary of the Think-Before-You-Write Process
  • 1.3 The Writing and Publishing Process
  • 1.3.1 Converting Preliminary Work into a Manuscript
  • 1.3.2 The Peer Review Process
  • 1.4 The Scientific Writing Style
  • Part II: Most Common Errors
  • Chapter 2: General Research and Writing Practices
  • 2.1 Insufficient Knowledge of the Literature
  • 2.2 Insufficient Citations
  • 2.2.1 Not Providing a Reference to Support an Observation
  • 2.2.2 Plagiarism
  • 2.3 Weak Citations
  • 2.3.1 Citing a Secondary Source
  • 2.3.2 Presenting Conclusions Rather Than Data from References
  • 2.3.3 Arguing from Authority
  • 2.4 References Not in Standard Style
  • 2.4.1 Varying Citation Format
  • 2.4.2 Not Proofreading References Prior to Submission
  • 2.5 Not Using Standard Draft Manuscript Form
  • 2.6 Repeating Information
  • 2.7 Labeling a Scientific Document as "Final"
  • 2.8 Characterizing an Observation as "The First"
  • 2.9 Errors in Reasoning
  • 2.9.1 Casual Assertion of Causality
  • 2.9.2 Assuming Association Is Causality
  • 2.9.3 Assuming Reported Behavior Reflects Actual Behavior
  • 2.9.4 Confusing Imperfect Recall with Recall Bias
  • 2.9.5 Confusing Absence of Recognition with Absence
  • 2.9.6 Asserting Seasonality with a Single Year of Data
  • 2.9.7 Drawing Conclusions Using Confirmation Bias
  • 2.10 Constructing a Multivariate Model Using Only Statistical Criteria
  • Chapter 3: Content of Quantitative Papers.
  • 3.1 Improper Focus or Format of Title and Abstract
  • 3.2 Confusing the Role of Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion
  • 3.3 Not Writing the Methods Section in Chronological Order
  • 3.4 Not Emphasizing Steps Taken to Protect Human Subjects
  • 3.5 Listing Interpretations, But Not Defending One in the Discussion
  • 3.6 Not Fully Explaining Limitations
  • 3.7 Writing Generic Recommendations
  • 3.8 Presenting New Data in the Discussion
  • 3.9 Reporting the Number of Enrolled Subjects in the Methods
  • 3.10 Specifying the Contents of a Questionnaire
  • 3.11 Naïve Theories of Change
  • 3.11.1 Recommending a Massive Increase in Funding
  • 3.11.2 Ignoring Incentives and Barriers
  • 3.11.3 Assuming Weak States Can Implement
  • 3.12 An Insufficiently Focused Introduction
  • 3.13 Failure to Clarify Key Sample Size Assumptions
  • 3.14 A High-Level Outline That Is Not High Level
  • 3.15 Specifying Software Used for Routine Data Analysis
  • 3.16 Presenting Rationale in the Last Sentence of the Introduction
  • Chapter 4: Mechanics of Writing
  • 4.1 Using Nonstandard Acronyms
  • 4.2 Using Nonstandard Spaces
  • 4.3 Improper Spelling
  • 4.4 Capitalization Problems
  • 4.4.1 Using All Capital Letters
  • 4.4.2 Capitalizing Non-proper Nouns
  • 4.5 Failure to Spell Out an Isolated Numeral &lt
  • 10
  • 4.6 Starting a Sentence with a Numeral
  • 4.7 Not Indenting Paragraphs
  • 4.8 Not Aligning Text to the Left
  • 4.9 Problems with Parentheses
  • 4.10 Not Recognizing When an Abbreviation Has Become a Name
  • 4.11 Misplaced Commas in Large Numbers
  • 4.12 Varying Fonts Within the Narrative
  • 4.13 Using Bulleted Lists Rather Than Sentences
  • 4.14 Uninformative Document Names
  • Chapter 5: Grammatical Structures and Stylistic Strategies
  • 5.1 Using Present Rather Than Past Tense
  • 5.2 Failure to Use Definite and Indefinite Articles.
  • 5.3 Excessive Use of Passive Voice
  • 5.4 Improper Use of "We"
  • 5.5 Writing from a Psychological Perspective
  • 5.6 Using Excessive Subheadings in the Discussion
  • 5.7 Misplaced Modifiers
  • 5.8 Using Nouns with Awkward Syntax in Place of Verbs
  • 5.9 Using Different Terms for the Same Object or the Same Idea
  • Chapter 6: Achieving Clarity and Conciseness
  • 6.1 Labeling Rather Than Explaining
  • 6.2 Using Weak Opening Phrases for Sentences
  • 6.3 Using Adjectives and Qualifiers
  • 6.4 Overusing Studies or Authors as Sentence Subjects
  • 6.5 Using Nondescriptive Numeric or Alphabetical Labels
  • 6.6 Using Respectively
  • 6.7 Using the Word Etcetera
  • 6.8 Using a Non-English Word as an English Word
  • 6.9 Describing Costs Only in Local Currency
  • 6.10 Using the Term "Developing Country"
  • 6.11 Using the Term "Socioeconomic Status" as a Synonym for Wealth
  • 6.12 Using a Technical Term in Its Nontechnical Sense
  • 6.12.1 Using the Term "Random" in Its Nontechnical Sense
  • 6.12.2 Using the Term "Reliable" in Its Nontechnical Sense
  • 6.12.3 Using the Term "Significant" in Its Nontechnical Sense
  • 6.12.4 Using the Term "Valid" in Its Nontechnical Sense
  • 6.12.5 Using the Term "Incidence" Incorrectly
  • 6.12.6 Using the Term "Correlated" Incorrectly
  • 6.13 Using the Term "Documented"
  • 6.14 Framing an Argument in Terms of Need
  • 6.15 Using the Term "Illiterate" as a Synonym for "No Formal Education"
  • 6.16 Using the Word "Challenging" as a Synonym for "Difficult"
  • 6.17 Describing a Laboratory Test Result as Positive
  • 6.18 Using Increase or Decrease in the Absence of a Time Trend
  • 6.19 Describing a Test as a Gold Standard
  • Chapter 7: Recording Scientific Data
  • 7.1 Using Statistics in Place of the Study Question to Frame Results
  • 7.1.1 Framing Narrative Results Around P-Values
  • 7.2 Not Presenting the Core Data.
  • 7.3 Using Too Many Decimal Places
  • 7.4 Using Too Few Decimal Places
  • 7.5 Using Incomplete Headings for Tables and Figures
  • 7.6 Imbalance Between Table and Narrative Presentation of Results
  • 7.6.1 Too Little Narrative Explaining the Tables
  • 7.6.2 Too Much Narrative Explaining the Tables
  • 7.6.3 Presenting Results in Narrative that Would Be Clearer in a Table
  • 7.7 Pointing Too Explicitly to Tables and Figures
  • 7.8 Using Inappropriate Figures
  • 7.9 Generic Data Tables That Lack a Clear Message
  • 7.10 Table Layout That Impairs Comparisons
  • 7.11 Using Less Informative Denominators in a Table
  • 7.12 Comparing to a Varying Baseline
  • 7.13 P-Value in a Baseline Table of a Randomized Controlled Trial
  • 7.14 Using Nonstandard Footnote Symbols in Tables
  • 7.15 Using the Wrong Symbol to Designate Degree
  • 7.16 Numbering Figures or Tables out of Sequence
  • 7.17 Maps with Irrelevant Details
  • Chapter 8: Approaching Publication
  • 8.1 Failure to Respond to Reviewers' Comments
  • 8.2 Incomplete Response to External Reviews
  • 8.2.1 Not Including Text of the Manuscript Changes in Response to External Reviewers
  • 8.3 Invalid Authorship Line
  • 8.4 Retaining Comments in Subsequent Drafts
  • 8.5 Choosing an Inappropriate Journal
  • 8.6 Not Following a Specific Journal's Details of Style
  • 8.7 Not Using an Appropriate Reporting Guideline
  • 8.8 Exceeding the Journal Word Limit
  • 8.9 Asking Your Senior Author to Recommend Reviewers
  • 8.10 Responding to Journal Reviewers Using the First Person Singular
  • 8.11 Missing Acknowledgment Section
  • 8.12 Reusing an Email Thread when Circulating a Revised Manuscript
  • 8.13 Requesting an Unprofessionally Short Turnaround Time
  • 8.14 Sending Blank Forms for Co-authors to Complete
  • 8.15 Not Providing Co-authors a Copy of the Submitted Manuscript.
  • 8.16 Not Keeping Co-authors Informed of Discussion with Journal Editors
  • 8.17 Emailing Draft Manuscripts with Figures That Are Not Compressed
  • 8.18 Not Including Readability Statistics
  • Chapter 9: Slide and Poster Presentations
  • 9.1 Bullets on the Wall
  • 9.2 Using Sentences for Bullet Points
  • 9.3 Too Much Space Between Bullets
  • 9.4 Using Bullets Without Hanging Indents
  • 9.5 Chart Junk
  • 9.6 Using Three-Dimensional Chart Features as Decorations
  • 9.7 Using a Pie Chart
  • 9.8 Using Vertical Bars When Horizontal Bars Would Communicate Better
  • 9.9 Copying a Manuscript Figure Instead of Developing a Custom Figure
  • 9.10 Photos with an Unnatural Aspect Ratio
  • 9.11 Too Many Photographs on a Single Slide
  • 9.12 Fieldworkers as the Dominant Subject of Photographs
  • 9.13 Including a Final "Thank You" Slide
  • 9.14 Failure to Separate Ideas in a Multilined Title
  • Appendix 1 Concept Note Outline
  • Appendix 2 Concept Note Example
  • Temporal Variability of Chlorine Demand in Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Study Question
  • Objectives
  • Rationale
  • Outcomes and Exposures
  • Study Design
  • Analysis
  • Study Sample
  • Data Collection
  • Human Subjects
  • Collaboration
  • Timeline and Budget
  • Limitations
  • Timeline
  • Budget
  • Appendix 3 Critical Questions for Protocol Development
  • Appendix 4 Framing Document
  • Appendix 5 Flowchart for Review of Scientific Documents
  • Appendix 6 High-Level Outline
  • Appendix 7 Example of Quantitative Manuscript HLO
  • Title: Difficulties in Maintaining Improved Handwashing Behavior, Karachi, Pakistan [17]
  • Appendix 8 Authorship Scorecard
  • Appendix 9 Conference/Scientific Meeting Abstracts
  • Appendix 10 JANE (Journal/Author Name Estimator)
  • Appendix 11 List of Common Errors
  • References.