Product Development Within Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and Legal Risk : Exemplary for Safe Autonomous Vehicles.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiesbaden :
Springer Vieweg. in Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH,
2022.
|
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Click to View |
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Danksagungen
- Abstract
- Zusammenfassung
- Symbols
- Contents
- Abbreviations
- List of Figures
- 1 Introduction
- 1.1 Initial situation
- 1.2 Objective and Research Questions
- 2 Findings from Traffic Accident Analysis
- 2.1 Motivation
- 2.2 Categorizing the Levels of Driving Automation
- 2.3 Accident Data to Demonstrate Potential Safety Benefits and Risks
- 2.4 Federal Road Traffic Accident Statistics in Germany
- 2.5 German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS)
- 2.6 Road Traffic Accident Statistics in the USA
- 2.7 International Road Accident Data Collections
- 2.8 Accident Data Collections of Automobile Manufacturers
- 2.9 Accident Data of the German Insurance Association
- 2.10 Accident Data Collections of Consumer Associations (ADAC)
- 2.11 The Fundamentals of Accident Data Analysis
- 2.11.1 Level of Data Collection versus Number of Cases
- 2.11.2 The Validity of Areas of Action Compared to Areas of Efficiency
- 2.11.3 Potential Safety Benefits Depending on Automation Levels and Degree of Efficiency
- 2.12 Significance of Possible Predictions Based on Accident Data
- 2.12.1 A Posteriori Analyses of Accident Data for "Driver Only"/"No Automation"
- 2.12.2 A Priori Predictions for Assisted and Partially Automated Driving
- 2.12.3 Potential Safety Benefits and Test Scenarios for Development of Highly and Fully Automated Driving
- 2.13 Potential Safety Benefits / Risks and Impacts on Testing
- 2.13.1 Human Error versus Technical Failure in Full Automation
- 2.13.2 Potential Safety Benefits - Human and Machine Performance
- 2.13.3 Artificial Intelligence versus Human Perception Limits and Consequence
- 2.13.4 Human Error versus Artificial Intelligence Incertitudes
- 2.13.5 Potential Safety Benefits of Fully Automated Vehicles in Inevitable Incidents.
- 2.14 Conclusion and Outlook
- 3 Analysis of Poor Visibility Real-World Test Scenarios
- 3.1 Motivation
- 3.2 Safe Development, Validation and Testing
- 3.2.1 Return of Feedback from Lifecycle of Automated Vehicles
- 3.2.2 Requirements for Automated Driving to Minimize Risk
- 3.3 Real-World Scenarios for Development and Testing
- 3.3.1 Machine versus Human Perception Limits with Consequences for Testing
- 3.3.2 Relevant Real-World Scenarios for Development and Testing
- 3.3.3 Integration of Relevant Test Scenarios for Safe Automated Vehicles
- 3.3.4 Test Scenarios and Requirements in Relation to Legal and Ethical Aspects
- 3.4 Conclusion and Outlook
- 4 Technical, Legal, and Economic Risks
- 4.1 Introduction Development
- 4.2 Motivation
- 4.3 Questions of Increased Automation's Product Safety
- 4.4 Continued Technical Development of Assistance Systems - New Opportunities and Risks
- 4.5 Expectations Regarding Safety of Complex Vehicle Technology
- 4.5.1 Steadily Rising Consumer Expectations for Vehicle Safety
- 4.5.2 Current Safety Expectations of Potential Users
- 4.5.3 Considerations of Risks and Benefits
- 4.6 Legal Requirements and Effects
- 4.6.1 Generally Accepted Rules of Technology
- 4.6.2 The Product Safety Law (ProdSG)
- 4.6.3 The Product Liability Law (ProdHaftG)
- 4.6.4 Ethics, Court Judgments to Operational Risk and Avoidability
- 4.7 Product Safety Enhancement in Automated Vehicles Based on Expert Knowledge from Liability and Warranty Claims
- 4.7.1 Experience from Product Crises and Traffic Accidents
- 4.7.2 Potential Hazard Situations at the Beginning of Development
- 4.7.3 Methods for Assessing Risks during Development
- 4.7.4 Approval Criteria from Expert Knowledge
- 4.7.5 Steps to Increase Product Safety of Automated Vehicles in the General Development Process.
- 4.7.6 Product Monitoring After Market Launch
- 4.7.7 Steps for Internationally Agreed Best Practices
- 4.8 Conclusion and Outlook:
- 5 Qualitative Interviews with Developers
- 5.1 Response from a Guided Development Process
- 5.2 Engineers: Sensible Creativity under Time Pressure
- 5.3 Psychologist within Development: Priority to Driver's Needs
- 5.4 Executives Focus on Responsibility for Duty of Care
- 5.5 Advantages of Guideline-Based Development
- 5.6 Conclusion: Structured Expert Communication Improves Quality
- 6 Consulting Concept to Develop New Systems
- 6.1 Intrinsic Motivation
- 6.2 Consulting Questions to Fulfill Duty of Care
- 6.3 Conclusion: Structured Guidelines Support a Safe System
- 7 Summary and Discussion
- 7.1 Current agile management changes
- 7.2 Findings
- 7.3 Integration of findings
- Annex A: Change in Jurisdiction on the Responsibility for Pedestrian Accidents
- Annex B: Summarized Questions for Developers
- Annex C: Questionnaire for Qualitative Interviews with Developers
- Suggested online questionnaire on guided development
- Additional Figures
- Glossary
- References: Collaborations out of research groups
- European Commission Project RESPONSE 2
- European Commission Project RESPONSE 3
- German Research Project simTD (Safe intelligent mobility - Test Field Germany)
- Research with Fraunhofer IVI and TU Munich
- References of the author
- List of References.