Access to Medicines and Vaccines : Implementing Flexibilities under Intellectual Property Law.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing AG,
2021.
|
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Click to View |
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Preface
- Contents
- Interpreting the Flexibilities Under the TRIPS Agreement
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Defining the TRIPS Flexibilities
- 3 TRIPS Flexibilities in WTO Jurisprudence
- 4 Interpretation of the TRIPS Agreement
- 4.1 Precedential Value of GATT/WTO Jurisprudence
- 4.2 Ordinary Meaning
- 4.3 Context
- 4.4 Object and Purpose
- 4.4.1 Legal Weight of the Doha Declaration
- 5 Conclusions
- References
- Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports of Pharmaceuticals: A Comparative and Critical Review
- 1 Introduction: The Relevance (and Resilience) of the Principle of Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Its Application to Pha...
- 2 Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Paralle Trade: General Considerations and Application to Pharmaceuticals
- 2.1 The Principle of Intellectual Property Exhaustion in International Trade: An Overview
- 2.2 Patent Exhaustion and the Debate on Parallel Trade of Pharmaceuticals
- 3 National Solutions to Patent Exhaustion and Parallel Trade of Pharmaceuticals
- 3.1 Selected Jurisdictions in Asia
- 3.2 Canada, United States, Australia, and New Zealand
- 3.3 Selected Jurisdictions in Latin America
- 3.4 European Union and Switzerland
- 3.5 Selected Jurisdictions in Africa
- 4 Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights and Parallel Trade of Pharmaceuticals
- 4.1 Overview of Overlapping Rights and Enforcement of Copyright to Parallel Imports
- 4.2 Enforcement of Trademark Rights to Parallel Imports of Pharmaceuticals
- 5 Conclusion: A Call for a Wider Application of the Flexibility of Article 6 of the TRIPS Agreement in Developing and Least De...
- References
- Compulsory Licenses and Government Use: Challenges and Opportunities
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Historical and Conceptual Roots
- 3 The TRIPS Framework
- 4 A Scan of the Use of TRIPS Flexibilities.
- 5 A Tale of Two Countries
- 5.1 The Zimbabwean Case
- 5.1.1 Compulsory Licences
- 5.1.2 Government Use
- 5.1.3 Lessons
- 5.2 The South African Case
- 5.2.1 Legal Framework
- 5.2.2 AIDS Denialism
- 5.2.3 US Pressure
- 5.2.4 Judicial Deference
- 5.2.5 New IP Policy Phase I
- 6 Compulsory Licensing Options Under TRIPS
- 6.1 Expanded Grounds for Compulsory Licences
- 6.2 Government Use
- 6.3 Adequate Remuneration
- 6.4 Procedures for Compulsory Licensing Applications
- 6.5 Collaboration and Cooperation in the Issuance of CLs
- 6.6 A Compulsory Licensing Facility
- 7 Conclusion
- References
- Cases
- Statutes and Statutory Instruments
- Books
- Contributions to Edited Books
- Journal Articles
- Online Journals
- Command Articles and Law Commission Reports
- Websites and Blogs
- Access to CRISPR Genome Editing Technologies: Patents, Human Rights and the Public Interest
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Human Genome
- 3 The CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing Technique
- 4 Lulu and Nana: The Chinese Genome-Edited Twins ``Immune from HIV ́́
- 5 Patenting the CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing Breakthrough
- 6 Excluding Genome Editing Technologies from Patentability
- 7 International Human Rights Law and Genome Editing
- 8 International Initiatives on the Regulation and Governance of Gene Editing
- 9 Concluding Remarks
- References
- Bolar Exception
- 1 Exceptions to Patent Rights
- 2 Rationale for the Bolar Exception
- 2.1 Marketing Authorization of Medical Products
- 2.2 Relationship of Patent Protection, Marketing Authorization and Supplementary Legal Protection
- 2.3 Role of Generic and Biosimilar Competition in Promoting Access
- 3 History of the Bolar Exception
- 4 Consistency with Article 30 of the TRIPS Agreement
- 5 Crafting National Legal Frameworks for the Bolar Exception
- 6 India Bolar Exception: Recent Developments.
- 7 Conclusions
- References
- Patent Oppositions in India
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Patent Oppositions in India
- 2.1 Gleevec Opposition
- 2.2 Valcyte Opposition
- 2.3 Herceptin Opposition
- 2.4 Zykadia Opposition
- 2.5 The Viread Oppositions
- 2.6 Kaletra Opposition
- 2.7 Reyataz Opposition
- 2.8 Combivir Opposition
- 2.9 Trizivir Opposition
- 2.10 Ziagen Opposition
- 2.11 Isentress Opposition
- 2.12 Sanofi TB Drugs Oppositions
- 2.13 Veklury Opposition
- 3 Pendency of Oppositions in the Indian Patent Office
- 3.1 Pre-grant Oppositions
- 3.2 Post-grant Oppositions
- 3.3 Pendency at the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB)
- 3.4 Impact of Pendency
- 4 Conclusion
- Annex: Opposition Pendency Data for the Period 2007-08 to 2019-2020
- References
- Protection of Clinical Test Data and Public Health: A Proposal to End the Stronghold of Data Exclusivity
- 1 Introduction: Test Data and Efficacy, Safety and Quality of Medicines
- 2 Generic and Biosimilar Medicine Marketing Approval and the Use of Test Data
- 3 Rationale for Data Exclusivity
- 3.1 Data Exclusivity and Patents
- 3.2 Data Exclusivityś Effectiveness in Stimulating Innovation
- 4 History of Data Exclusivity
- 4.1 Data Exclusivity in the United States
- 4.2 Data Exclusivity in the European Union
- 4.3 Protection of Test Data and the Rules of the World Trade Organization
- 5 Data Exclusivity in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs)
- 6 Data Exclusivity and TRIPS Flexibilities
- 6.1 Compulsory Licensing and Government Use in Drug Procurement
- 6.2 Data Exclusivity and Compulsory Licensing
- 6.3 Remedies to Data Exclusivity Barriers and Compulsory Licensing
- 6.4 Data Exclusivity Waivers in FTAs
- 6.5 EU Medicines Regulation and Compulsory Licensing
- 6.6 EU Data Exclusivity Waiver and Compulsory Licence for Export.
- 6.7 Data Exclusivity Waivers in Voluntary Patent Licences
- 6.8 Public Health Measures, Data Exclusivity and Competition Law
- 6.9 EU Law Needs an Explicit Data Exclusivity Waiver
- 7 Conclusion and Recommendations
- References
- Courts and Pharmaceutical Patents: From Formalist Positivism to the Emergence of a Global Law
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Assessing the Role of Courts in TRIPS Flexibilities As Forms of Structural Change
- 3 Access and Innovation in Legal Discourse: From Opposition to Coexistence
- 4 Trastuzumab High Price Litigation in Brazil
- 5 The Sofosbuvir Case in Brazil
- 6 Theoretical Conclusions on the Role of Courts in IP Based on the Concrete Cases
- 7 Concluding Remarks
- References
- Robust Patent Examination or Deep Harmonization? Cooperation and Work Sharing Between Patent Offices
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Patent Examination: A Critical TRIPS Flexibility
- 3 Approaches to Patent Harmonisation
- 3.1 Normative Approaches
- 3.2 Persuasive Approaches
- 3.2.1 Technical Assistance
- 3.2.2 Quality of Patents
- 4 PCT Reforms
- 4.1 Working Group on PCT Reforms
- 4.1.1 Establishment of a Written Opinion on Patentability to Accompany the International Search Report
- 4.1.2 Automatic Designation of all PCT Contracting Parties for National Phase Entry
- 4.1.3 Establishment of an Optional Supplementary International Search
- 4.2 New PCT Working Group
- 5 Work Sharing Arrangements Between Patent Offices
- 5.1 Trilateral Cooperation
- 5.2 IP5 Cooperation
- 5.3 The Vancouver Group
- 5.4 PROSUR
- 5.5 ASPEC
- 5.6 IP BRICS
- 5.7 Patent Prosecution Highway
- 6 Opportunities and Challenges
- 6.1 South-South Cooperation
- 6.2 Safeguarding and Utilising TRIPS Flexibilities
- 6.3 Use of Technology
- 6.4 Administrative Law Oversight
- 7 Conclusion
- References.
- Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs), Competition Law and Excessive Pricing of Medicines
- 1 Introduction
- 2 TRIPS and Competition Policy: Orientations and Enforcement Trends in the Pharmaceutical Sector
- 2.1 The Interface Between IPRs and Competition Law
- 2.2 TRIPS and Competition Law: Competition Law as Flexibility Tool
- 2.3 Enforcement Trends of Competition Law in the Pharmaceutical Sector
- 3 Excessive Pricing of Pharmaceuticals: An Emerging Enforcement Trend
- 3.1 Pricing of Pharmaceuticals and IPRs
- 3.2 Overview of the Case Law on Excessive Pricing of Pharmaceuticals
- 3.3 Competition and IP Issues Raised by the Case Law on Excessing Pricing of Pharmaceuticals
- 3.3.1 IP, Patent Term and Excessive Pricing of Pharmaceuticals
- 3.3.2 Competition Law and Excessive Pricing of Pharmaceuticals: Market Conditions and Pricing
- Market Power, Size of the Market and High Pricing
- Absence of Substitutability and High Pricing of Pharmaceuticals
- Consumer Choice/Behavior (Rationality) and the Specificity of Pharmaceuticals
- The Issue of the Determination of an Excessive Price
- 4 Excessive Pricing of Pharmaceuticals and TRIPS Flexibilities: Lessons from the Excessive Prices Cases
- 5 Conclusions
- References
- The Impact of `TRIPS-Plus ́Rules on the Use of TRIPS Flexibilities: Dealing with the Implementation Challenges
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Expensive Medicines: National Implications and Global Challenges
- 3 Unequal Investment and More Monopoly
- 4 The Double Taxation of Society
- 5 More Pharmaceutical Patents, Weaker Innovation
- 6 Increased IP Standards: From TRIPS-Minus to TRIPS-Plus
- 6.1 The Flexibilities Explained
- 6.2 Putting the Flexibilities into Use
- 6.3 The Shift Towards TRIPS-Plus
- 6.4 Impact and Examples of TRIPS-Plus Obligations
- 7 What Could Be Done and What Is Done?
- 7.1 Australia
- 7.2 Chile.
- 7.3 What Others Are Doing and How They Are Doing It?.