Federalism and Secession.
The controversial issue of secession has received little attention from experts of federalism. The best federal studies either evade it or dismiss it in a few lines. However, this issue has been present throughout the history of federations. This book is one of the first to explore the complex relat...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Brussels :
P.I.E. - Peter Lang SA Éditions Scientifiques Internationales,
2021.
|
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Series: | Diversitas Series
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Click to View |
Table of Contents:
- Cover
- Copyright information
- Acknowledgements
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 Federalism(s) and secession: from constitutional theory to practice
- Introduction
- 1. Confederation: a "free union" that hides its true nature?
- 1.1 From a union of sovereign states …
- 1.1.1 Confederation as viewed in Kantian political philosophy
- 1.1.2 The concept of confederation in public law
- 1.2 … to a "perpetual confederation"
- 1.2.1 Confederal laws against secession
- 1.2.2 The philosophical turning-point in the 16th century: the Dutch influence
- 1.2.3 Universalization of the right of secession: the US Declaration of Independence
- 2. The federal state: an "indissoluble union"?
- 2.1 Federal positive law
- 2.1.1 Federal constitutions expressly allowing a right of secession
- a) Constitutions that recognized a right of secession in the past
- b) Constitutions currently recognizing a right of secession
- 2.1.2 Federal constitutions excluding all forms of secession
- 2.1.3 Constitutions that remain silent on the question of secession
- a) Interpretation by Supreme Court justices: a centripetal constitutional force
- b) Federal realpolitik
- 2.2 Using constitutional theory to cut the Gordian knot of secession
- 2.2.1 The trap set by the syncretism of the federal state
- 2.2.2 Redefining the constitutional basis for secession
- a) Partial versus total revision
- b) Actual cases
- 2 Secession from a federation: a plea for an autonomous concept of federative secession 1
- Introduction
- 1. Defining and identifying the concept of federative secession
- 1.1 The dominant conception of secession
- 1.1.1 Secession seen as the aspiration of an infra-state (or infra-nation) group to constitute its own state or nation
- 1.1.2 The legal dogma on secession
- a) Secession is not dissolution
- b) Secession is not devolution.
- 1.2 Federative secession and conceptual autonomy
- 1.2.1 Why the state-centric view of secession fails to account for the specific nature of federative secession
- 1.2.2 Dogma on federative secession
- a) Federative secession and intra-federative secession
- b) Secession of a member state and exclusion of a member state
- c) Unilateral or non-unilateral secession?
- d) The effects of secession: secession and dissolution
- 2. Deciding the licitness of federative secession: neither authorized nor prohibited (like secession from a unitary state)
- 2.1 Federative secession cannot be prohibited a priori
- 2.2 The impossible licitness of unilateral federative secession
- 3. The impossibility of imposing a legal sanction on federative secession
- 3.1 The distinction between federal intervention and federal execution
- 3.2 The Civil War, or the division of the union institutionalized by war
- 3 Are federalism and secession really incompatible?
- Introduction
- 1. General approach
- 2. Secession as seen by the theoreticians of federalism
- 3. Secession in positive law
- 4. Secession and "legal logic"
- Conclusion
- 4 From referendum to secession - Qu é bec's self-determination process and its lessons *
- Introduction
- 1 The constitutional capacity of Qu é bec's institutions to hold a referendum - A stake little debated or opposed
- 1.1 The historical dimensions leading to referendums on the sovereignty of Qu é bec
- 1.1.1 Referendum practices in Qu é bec and Canada prior to the debates on secession
- 1.1.2 The 1980 and 1995 referendums on Qu é bec sovereignty
- 1.2 The legal aspects allowing self-determination referendums in Canada
- 1.2.1 The absence of constitutional restrictions on holding referendums
- 1.2.2 Constitutional practices with respect to referendums.
- 2 Qu é bec's constitutional ability to declare its independence - An issue far less consensual
- 2.1 The activism of federal institutions
- 2.1.1 The Reference re Secession of Qu é bec and the conciliation of strongly diverging interests by the Supreme Court of Canada
- 2.1.2 The Clarity Act and the federal parliament's declaration that it was both party and judge in the constitutional dispute
- 2.2 The contemporary evolution of the debate and some unanswered questions
- 2.2.1 The threshold of the popular majority required for Qu é bec to declare independence
- 2.2.2 The ambiguity surrounding the duty to negotiate and the process of constitutional amendment
- Conclusion
- 5 Compromise or dislocation: federal alternatives to secessionist and centralizing temptations
- Introduction
- 1. Federalism in Spain
- 1.1 The federal projects of political parties in the central state
- 1.2 The federal projects of political parties at the regional level
- 2. Federalism and the right to self-determination
- Conclusion
- Notes about the Contributors
- Series index.