Unsettling Responsibility in Science Education : Indigenous Science, Deconstruction, and the Multicultural Science Education Debate.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing AG,
2020.
|
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Series: | Palgrave Studies in Educational Futures Series
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Click to View |
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Contents
- Arc I Unsettling the Metaphysics of Responsibility
- 1 Unsettling Metaphysics in Science Education
- My Relation to Indigenous Metaphysics, the Metaphysics of Modernity, and Science Education
- On Unsettling Science Education: Decolonizing and Deconstructing
- First Orientation: An Introduction to Decolonizing and Postcolonial Science Education and Their Relationships to Metaphysics
- Second Orientation: (Re)Opening Science Education to Indigenous Science to-Come Through Deconstruction and Reconstruction
- Conclusion: Towards a Metaphysics of Response-Ability in Science Education
- References
- 2 The Homework of Response-Ability in Science Education
- Preamble: Responsibility and De/Colonizing Science Education
- Encountering the Subtle Yet Important Difference Between Response-Ability and Responsibility in My De/Colonizing Science Education Practice
- Epistemic Ignorance and/in Science Education
- The Homework of Response-Ability (Towards Indigenous Science) in Science Education
- Conclusion: Response-Ability as Moving Within, Against, and Beyond the (Fore)Closure of Epistemic Ignorance oR Deconstruction as Learning to Learn
- References
- Arc II Critical Possibilities and Possible Critiques Through Deconstructive Play in/of the Multicultural Science Education Debate
- 3 Serious Play: Inflecting the Multicultural Science Education Debate Through and for (Socratic) Dialogue
- Prelude to (a) Serious Play
- Programme for (a) "Serious Play" To-Come
- Act 1: Setting the Stage for (a) "Serious Play"
- From the Dialectic of Discussion to Bohmian Dialogue: An Ethic for Seriously Playing Together
- The Serious Play of (Re)Signification
- Socratic Dialogue as (a) Serious Play
- Act 2: The Programme for (a) "Serious Play": A Primer for Playing Along
- Who Is Playing (or Played)?.
- Rules for (a) Serious Play
- Act 3: "Two Science Educators Walk into a Bar": A Socratic Dialogue on Multicultural Science Education
- Act 4: Playing Out the (Re)Production of Knowledge
- When (Re)Signifying Is Signifying Again Rather Than Anew
- What Continues to (Not) Be at Play? Possibilities for Further Dialogue Through the Play of (Re)Signification
- Epilogue to (a) "Serious Play": A Call for Further Serious Play Through Dialogue
- References
- 4 Mirrors, Prisms, and Diffraction Gratings: Placing the Optics of the Critical Gaze in Science Education Under Erasure (After the Critique of Critique)
- The Subject of Critique: My Relation to Critique in/of Science Education
- The Optics of Critique: Why the Optical Configurations We (Metaphorically) Deploy Matter
- Critical and Complicit (Mis)Readings of the Optics of Critique: Science Education Under Erasure
- Mirror upon Mirrors: Matters of Fact, Matters of Fiction, and Science Education
- Foucault's Prismatic Critique: Proximal and Dispersive Critical Relationality
- Baradian Diffraction: Including the Critical Apparatus in the Production of Critique
- Conclusion: Re(Con)Figuring Critique in Science Education
- References
- Arc III Tinkering with Ontology with/in the Multicultural Science Education Debate
- 5 Tinkering with/in the Multicultural Science Education Debate: Towards Positing An(Other) Ontology
- A Preamble on Tinkering: Derrida on the Porous Dichotomy Between Bricolage and Engineering
- Having and Being Had by "Common Sense" During a Science Education Project in Nunavut
- Tinkering with/in "Common Sense," Ontology and the Multicultural Science Education Debate
- Epistemic Realism and/as "Common Sense?" Ontological Situatedness and/in the Multicultural Science Education Debate
- From Ontological Alignment to Positing an Ontology in Science Education.
- Why Positing an Ontology Matters: Towards Accountability for How Reality Is Understood
- Positing An(Other-Than-Cartesian) Ontology: Towards Ontological Pluralism in Science Education
- Conclusion: Positing an Ontology as an Ethical Call
- References
- 6 Positing Cartesianism as an Ontology Within Science Education: Towards a More Response-Able Inheritance with Dr. Frédérique Apffel-Marglin
- Pathways of Chance: Encountering Dr. Frédérique Apffel-Marglin
- Tinkering with/in Expert Interview: De/Signing Research Methodology
- Before: Tinkering with/in Expert Interview Content
- During: Expert Interview Tinkering with/in Itself
- After: Tinkering with/in Expert Interview (Re)Presentation
- Diffracting an Interview with Dr. Frédérique Apffel-Marglin: On the (Re)Production and Operationalization of Cartesianism and What It Produces
- First Cut: Dr. Frédérique Apffel-Marglin on Nature/Culture
- First Cut-Nature/Culture and the Multicultural Science Education Debate
- Second Cut: Dr. Frédérique Apffel-Marglin on Descartes, Boyle, and Newton
- Second Cut: Descartes, Boyle, Newton, and the Multicultural Science Education Debate
- Third Cut: Dr. Frédérique Apffel-Marglin on the Enclosure, the Double-Sided Ledger, and the Laboratory
- Third Cut: The Enclosure, the Double-Sided Ledger, the Laboratory, and the Multicultural Science Education Debate
- Fourth Cut: Dr. Frédérique Apffel-Marglin on the Modest Witness, When One Truth Becomes Two, and the Thirty Years' War
- Fourth Cut: The Modest Witness, When One Truth Becomes Two, the Thirty Years' War, and the Multicultural Science Education Debate
- Conclusion: Positing, Accounting for and Being Accountable to an Ontology in Science Education
- References
- Arc IV Towards a Curriculum for Indigenous Science To-Come
- 7 Response-ability Revisited: Towards Re(con)figuring Scientific Literacy.
- Revisiting Response-Ability at the Cultural Interface
- Considering Methodologies and Pedagogies for/at the Cultural Interface
- The Homework of Response-Ability Revisited: Towards a Reconstructive Response
- Science Curriculum and Response-Ability: Re(Con)Figuring Scientific Literacy
- Response-Ability as Ongoing Rupturing: Scientific Literacy as Central yet Uncertain
- Response-Ability as the Iterative Reworking of Im/Possibility: Karen Barad's Shift from Scientific Literacy to Agential Literacy
- Response-Ability as the Cross-Cutting of Topological Re(con)figuring: Gregory Cajete's Indigenous Ways-of-Knowing-in-Being and Science Curriculum as All my Relations
- Response-Ability as Putting to Work Points of Resonance: (Re)Thinking Scientific Literacy at the Cultural Interface
- Conclusion: Response-Able Design as a Hospitable Move Towards Indigenous Science to-Come
- References
- 8 Towards Being Wounded by Thought: Indigenous Metaphysics Is (Still) Waiting in the Wings of Science Education
- Summary of the Argument so Far (For Readers in a Hurry…)3: Mapping Pathways Travelled upon and Those (yet-)to-Come
- Chapter 1: Unsettling Metaphysics in Science Education
- Chapter 2: The Homework of Response-Ability in Science Education
- Chapter 3: Serious Play: Inflecting the Multicultural Science Education Debate Through and for (Socratic) Dialogue
- Chapter 4: Mirrors, Prisms, and Diffraction Gratings: Placing the Optics of the Critical Gaze in Science Education Under Erasure (After the Critique of Critique)
- Chapter 5: Tinkering with/in the Multicultural Science Education Debate: Towards Positing an(Other) Ontology
- Chapter 6: Positing Cartesianism as an Ontology Within Science Education: Towards a More Response-Able Inheritance with Dr. Frédérique Apffel-Marglin.
- Chapter 7: Response-Ability Revisited: Towards Re(con)figuring Scientific Literacy
- An Open-Ended Conclusion: Indigenous Metaphysics Is (Still) Waiting in the Wings of Science Education
- References
- Index.