The Models of Engaged Learning and Teaching : Connecting Sophisticated Thinking from Early Childhood to PhD.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Singapore :
Springer Singapore Pte. Limited,
2020.
|
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Series: | SpringerBriefs in Education Series
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Click to View |
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Preface
- Place Value
- Acknowledgements
- Contents
- Acronyms
- 1 What Is Our Purpose?
- 1.1 Purpose
- 1.2 MELT Components
- 1.2.1 MELT Facets
- 1.2.2 Continuum of Learning Autonomy
- 1.2.3 MELT as a Thinking Routine
- 1.3 Parachute
- 1.3.1 MELT Features in Parachute
- 1.4 100 Billion Brains: Learning from Human Prehistory to Contemporary Classrooms and Learning Environments
- 1.4.1 Beaver and Human Know-How
- 1.4.2 Inevitable Earth: Problems with Dams
- 1.5 One Billion Brains More: The Problems We Face Need Research-Mindedness
- 1.6 Structure of This Book
- 1.7 Conclusion: Student Learning that Resonates
- References
- 2 What Will We Use?
- 2.1 Introducing the Models of Engaged Learning and Teaching
- 2.1.1 A Holistic View
- 2.1.2 The Origins of the MELT
- 2.1.3 Learning Autonomy
- 2.2 Silver Fluoride
- 2.3 Student Experiences of MELT Facets and Autonomy
- 2.3.1 Embark &
- Clarify
- 2.3.2 Find &
- Generate
- 2.3.3 Evaluate &
- Reflect
- 2.3.4 Organise &
- Manage
- 2.3.5 Analyse &
- Synthesise
- 2.3.6 Communicate &
- Apply
- 2.3.7 Spiralling, Recursive and Messy
- 2.4 Conclusion: Engagement, Adaptability, Fluidity and Ownership
- References
- 3 How Do We Arrange?
- 3.1 MELT Connecting
- 3.2 Many Models Across Educational Levels and Contexts
- 3.2.1 Early Childhood
- 3.2.2 Year 4/5 Primary
- 3.2.3 Year 6 Primary School
- 3.2.4 Year 8 Subject-Specific: A Case Study
- 3.2.5 Year 7-10 High School Transdisciplinary Projects
- 3.2.6 Technical Education
- 3.2.7 Undergraduate
- 3.2.8 Work Integrated Learning
- 3.2.9 Course-Based Master's Degree Programmes
- 3.2.10 Academic Research: Doctoral, Master's and Early Career Research (ECR)
- 3.2.11 Interdisciplinary Studies and Digital Literacy
- 3.3 Outside the MELT Parameters
- 3.4 Conclusion: Commonality with Adaptability.
- References
- 4 What Do We Trust?
- 4.1 Gullible Consumers or Discerning Users?
- 4.2 Shrink
- 4.3 MELT Analysis of Shrink
- 4.3.1 What Did Tara Trust?
- 4.4 Three Theoretical Orientations to Learning: Objectivism, Social Constructivism and Personal Constructivism
- 4.5 Understanding the Three Theories Using the Example of Shrink
- 4.5.1 Objectivist Perspective on Shrink
- 4.5.2 Personal Constructivist perspective on Shrink
- 4.5.3 Social Constructivism on Shrink
- 4.5.4 All Three
- 4.6 Theoretical Underpinning of MELT
- 4.6.1 Theory on Learner and Teacher Autonomy
- 4.6.2 Autonomy and Metaphor Together
- 4.7 Trusting the MELT?
- 4.8 Conclusion: Conversations and Arguments
- References
- 5 What Does It Mean?
- 5.1 Situating Contemporary Learning Theories/Ideas
- 5.1.1 Threshold Concepts [2]
- 5.1.2 Cognitive Load Theory [3]
- 5.1.3 Connectivism [4]
- 5.1.4 Schön's Reflective Practitioner [5]
- 5.1.5 Corporately Destructive or Mutually Informative?
- 5.2 MELT for Curriculum Design and Improvement
- 5.2.1 Teacher Action Research
- 5.2.2 Conjoined Action Research: From the Transferability of Individual Studies to Generalisability When Using an a Priori Framework
- 5.3 Conclusion: Multifaceted Use with the Same Overarching Purpose
- References
- 6 How Do We Relate?
- 6.1 Soyuz and Apollo: A Story About a Cold War Meeting in Orbit
- 6.2 Inevitable Earth
- 6.3 Evitable Earth
- 6.4 Retheorising Theory in Education, from 'Competition' to 'Complement'
- 6.5 Conclusion: It's Only When We Relate to Divergent Practices, Concepts and Places in Education that We Will Solve Our Educational Problems
- References
- 7 How Much Guidance?
- 7.1 Autonomy: Engaged Learning, Engaged Teaching
- 7.2 Conclusion: Structure Provided, Creativity Needed
- References
- Glossary of MELT Terms
- Index.