Good Research Practice in Non-Clinical Pharmacology and Biomedicine.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing AG,
2020.
|
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Series: | Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology Series
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Click to View |
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Preface
- Contents
- Quality in Non-GxP Research Environment
- 1 Why Do We Need a Quality Standard in Research?
- 2 Critical Points to Consider Before Implementing a Quality Standard in Research
- 2.1 GxP or Non-GxP Standard Implementation in Research?
- 2.1.1 Diverse Quality Mind-Set
- 2.2 Resource Constraints
- 3 Non-GxP Research Standard Basics
- 3.1 Data Integrity Principles: ALCOA+
- 3.2 Research Quality System Core Elements
- 3.2.1 Management and Governance
- 3.2.2 Secure Research Documentation and Data Management
- 3.2.3 Method and Assay Qualification
- 3.2.4 Material, Reagents and Samples Management
- 3.2.5 Facility, Equipment and Computerized System Management
- 3.2.6 Personnel and Training Records Management
- 3.2.7 Outsourcing/External Collaborations
- 3.3 Risk- and Principle-Based Quality System Assessment Approach
- 4 How Can the Community Move Forward?
- 4.1 Promoting Quality Culture
- 4.1.1 Raising Scientist Awareness, Training and Mentoring
- 4.1.2 Empowering of Associates
- 4.1.3 Incentives for Behaviours Which Support Research Quality
- 4.1.4 Promoting a Positive Error Culture
- 4.2 Creating a Recognized Quality Standard in Research: IMI Initiative - EQIPD
- 4.3 Funders Plan to Enhance Reproducibility and Transparency
- 5 Conclusion
- References
- Guidelines and Initiatives for Good Research Practice
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Guidelines and Resources Aimed at Improving Reproducibility and Robustness in Preclinical Data
- 2.1 Funders/Granting Agencies/Policy Makers
- 2.2 Publishers/Journal Groups
- 2.3 Summary of Overarching Themes
- 3 Gaps and Looking to the Future
- References
- Learning from Principles of Evidence-Based Medicine to Optimize Nonclinical Research Practices
- 1 Introduction.
- 2 Current Context of Nonclinical, Nonregulated Experimental Pharmacology Study Conduct: Purposes and Processes Across Sectors
- 2.1 Outcomes and Deliverables of Nonclinical Pharmacology Studies in Industry and Academia
- 2.2 Scientific Integrity: Responsible Conduct of Research and Awareness of Cognitive Bias
- 2.3 Initiating a Research Project and Documenting Prior Evidence
- 2.4 Existence and Use of Guidelines
- 2.5 Use of Experimental Bias Reduction Measures in Study Design and Execution
- 2.6 Biostatistics: Access and Use to Enable Appropriate Design of Nonclinical Pharmacology Studies
- 2.7 Data Integrity, Reporting, and Sharing
- 3 Overcoming Obstacles and Further Learning from Principles of Evidence-Based Medicine
- 3.1 Working Together to Improve Nonclinical Data Reliability
- 3.2 Enhancing Capabilities, from Training to Open Access to Data
- 4 Conclusion and Perspectives
- References
- General Principles of Preclinical Study Design
- 1 An Overview
- 2 General Scientific Methods for Designing In Vivo Experiments
- 2.1 Hypotheses and Effect Size
- 2.2 Groups, Experimental Unit and Sample Size
- 2.3 Measurements and Outcome Measures
- 2.4 Independent Variables and Analysis
- 3 Experimental Biases: Definitions and Methods to Reduce Them
- 4 Experimental Biases: Major Domains and General Principles
- 5 Existing Guidelines and How to Use Them
- 6 Exploratory and Confirmatory Research
- References
- Resolving the Tension Between Exploration and Confirmation in Preclinical Biomedical Research
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Discrimination Between Exploration and Confirmation
- 3 Exploration Must Lead to a High Rate of False Positives
- 4 The Garden of Forking Paths
- 5 Confirmation Must Weed Out the False Positives of Exploration
- 6 Exact Replication Does Not Equal Confirmation.
- 7 Design, Analysis, and Interpretation of Exploratory vs Confirmatory Studies
- 8 No Publication Without Confirmation?
- 9 Team Science and Preclinical Multicenter Trials
- 10 Resolving the Tension Between Exploration and Confirmation
- References
- Blinding and Randomization
- 1 Randomization and Blinding: Need for Disambiguation
- 2 Randomization
- 2.1 Varieties of Randomization
- 2.1.1 Simple Randomization
- 2.1.2 Block Randomization
- 2.1.3 Stratified Randomization
- 2.1.4 The Case of Within-Subject Study Designs
- 2.2 Tools to Conduct Randomization
- 2.3 Randomization: Exceptions and Special Cases
- 3 Blinding
- 3.1 Fit-for-Purpose Blinding
- 3.1.1 Assumed Blinding
- 3.1.2 Partial Blinding
- 3.1.3 Full Blinding
- 3.2 Implementation of Blinding
- 4 Concluding Recommendations
- References
- Out of Control? Managing Baseline Variability in Experimental Studies with Control Groups
- 1 What Are Control Groups?
- 2 Basic Considerations for Control Groups
- 2.1 Attribution of Animals to Control Groups
- 2.2 What Group Size for Control Groups?
- 2.3 Controls and Blinding
- 3 Primary Controls
- 3.1 Choosing Appropriate Control Treatments: Not All Negative Controls Are Equal
- 3.2 Vehicle Controls
- 3.3 Sham Controls
- 3.4 Non-neutral Control Groups
- 3.5 Controls for Mutant, Transgenic and Knockout Animals
- 4 Positive Controls
- 5 Secondary Controls
- 5.1 Can Baseline Values Be Used as Control?
- 5.2 Historical Control Values
- 6 When Are Control Groups Not Necessary?
- 7 Conclusion
- References
- Quality of Research Tools
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Drugs in the Twenty-First Century
- 2.1 Chemical Tools Versus Drugs
- 3 First Things First: Identity and Purity
- 3.1 The Case of Evans Blue
- 3.2 Identity and Purity of Research Reagents
- 4 Drug Specificity or Drug Selectivity?
- 5 Species Selectivity.
- 5.1 Animal Strain and Preclinical Efficacy Using In Vivo Models
- 5.2 Differences in Sequence of Biological Target
- 5.3 Metabolism
- 6 What We Dose Is Not Always Directly Responsible for the Effects We See
- 6.1 Conditions Where In Vitro Potency Measures Do Not Align
- 7 Chemical Modalities: Not All Drugs Are Created Equal
- 8 Receptor Occupancy and Target Engagement
- 9 Radioligands and PET Ligands as Chemical Tools
- 10 Monoclonal Antibodies as Target Validation Tools
- 10.1 Targets Amenable to Validation by mAbs
- 10.2 The Four Pillars for In Vivo Studies
- 10.3 Quality Control of Antibody Preparation
- 10.4 Isotype
- 10.5 Selectivity
- 11 Parting Thoughts
- References
- Genetic Background and Sex: Impact on Generalizability of Research Findings in Pharmacology Studies
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Genetic Background: The Importance of Strain and Substrain
- 3 Importance of Including Sex as a Variable
- 4 Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Differences Attributable to Sex
- 5 Improving Reproducibility Through Heterogeneity
- 6 Good Research Practices in Pharmacology Include Considerations for Sex, Strain, and Age: Advantages and Limitations
- 7 Conclusions and Recommendations
- References
- Building Robustness into Translational Research
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous Models
- 2.1 Animal Species and Strain
- 2.2 Sex of Animals
- 2.3 Age
- 2.4 Comorbidities
- 3 Translational Bias
- 3.1 Single Versus Multiple Pathophysiologies
- 3.2 Timing of Intervention
- 3.3 Pharmacokinetics and Dosage Choice
- 4 Conclusions
- References
- Minimum Information and Quality Standards for Conducting, Reporting, and Organizing In Vitro Research
- 1 Introduction: Why Details Matter
- 2 Efforts to Standardize In Vitro Protocols
- 2.1 The MIAME Guidelines
- 2.2 The MIBBI Portal
- 2.3 Protocol Repositories.
- 3 The Role of Ontologies for In Vitro Studies
- 3.1 Ontologies for Cells and Cell Lines
- 3.2 The BioAssay Ontology
- 3.3 Applications of the BAO to Bioassay Databases
- 4 Specific Examples: Quality Requirements for In Vitro Research
- 4.1 Chemical Probes
- 4.2 Cell Line Authentication
- 4.3 Antibody Validation
- 4.4 Webtools Without Minimal Information Criteria
- 4.5 General Guidelines for Reporting In Vitro Research
- 5 Open Questions and Remaining Issues
- 5.1 Guidelines vs. Standards
- 5.2 Compliance and Acceptance
- 5.3 Coordinated Efforts
- 5.4 Format and Structured Data
- 6 Concluding Remarks
- References
- Minimum Information in In Vivo Research
- 1 Introduction
- 2 General Aspects
- 3 Behavioural Experiments
- 4 Anaesthesia and Analgesia
- 5 Ex Vivo Biochemical and Histological Analysis
- 6 Histology
- 7 Ex Vivo Biochemical Analysis
- 8 Perspective
- References
- A Reckless Guide to P-values
- 1 Introduction
- 1.1 On the Role of Statistics
- 2 All About P-values
- 2.1 Hypothesis Test and Significance Test
- 2.2 Contradictory Instructions
- 2.3 Evidence Is Local
- Error Rates Are Global
- 2.4 On the Scaling of P-values
- 2.5 Power and Expected P-values
- 3 Practical Problems with P-values
- 3.1 The Significance Filter Exaggeration Machine
- 3.2 Multiple Comparisons
- 3.3 P-hacking
- 3.4 What Is a Statistical Model?
- 4 P-values and Inference
- References
- Electronic Lab Notebooks and Experimental Design Assistants
- 1 Paper vs. Electronic Lab Notebooks
- 2 Finding an eLN
- 3 Levels of Quality for eLNs
- 4 Assistance with Experimental Design
- 5 Data-Related Quality Aspects of eLNs
- 6 The LN as the Central Element of Data Management
- 7 Organizing and Documenting Experiments
- References
- Data Storage
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Data Storage Systems
- 2.1 Types of Storage.
- 2.2 Features of Storage Systems.