European e-Democracy in Practice.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hennen, Leonhard.
Other Authors: van Keulen, Ira., Korthagen, Iris., Aichholzer, Georg., Lindner, Ralf., Nielsen, Rasmus Øjvind.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cham : Springer International Publishing AG, 2019.
Edition:1st ed.
Series:Studies in Digital Politics and Governance Series
Subjects:
Online Access:Click to View
Table of Contents:
  • Intro
  • Acknowledgements
  • Contents
  • About the Editors and Authors
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
  • 1.1 State and Perspectives of e-Democracy
  • 1.2 Design of the Study and Layout of the Book
  • References
  • Part I: The State of Scholarly Discussions
  • Chapter 2: E-Democracy: Conceptual Foundations and Recent Trends
  • 2.1 Organisation and Theoretical Framework
  • 2.1.1 Introduction of Basic Concepts
  • 2.1.1.1 The Liberal Model of Democracy
  • 2.1.1.2 The Republican or Participatory Model
  • 2.1.1.3 The Deliberative Model of Democracy
  • 2.1.2 The Concept and Definition of e-Democracy
  • 2.1.3 Democracy-Related Potential of Information and Communication Technologies
  • 2.1.4 Dimensions of e-Democracy
  • 2.1.5 Participatory Democracy in European Union Legal Frameworks
  • 2.2 Web 2.0 and Social Media: Threats and Promises for Democratic Discourse
  • 2.2.1 Introduction
  • 2.2.2 Key Tenets of the Debate About Social Mediaś Role in Political Communication
  • 2.2.3 Redefining the Political Towards Personalised Politics?
  • 2.2.4 Social Media and Their Potential Impacts on Political Participation
  • 2.2.4.1 Social Media and Political Communication
  • 2.2.4.2 Social Media and the Quality of Deliberation
  • 2.2.4.3 Political Activism and Social Media
  • 2.2.4.4 Political Consumerism
  • 2.2.4.5 Social Media and Elected Representatives
  • 2.2.4.6 Effects on Political Opinion and Behaviour: Inconclusive Results
  • 2.2.5 Summarising the Perspectives
  • 2.3 Conclusions
  • References
  • Chapter 3: E-Democracy and the European Public Sphere
  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 The Democratic Deficit of the European Union
  • 3.2.1 Legitimisation of EU Politics in Times of Crisis
  • 3.2.2 ``No Demos?́́ European Identity and Citizenship
  • 3.2.3 Politicisation of Europe and European Citizenship
  • 3.3 A European Public Sphere?.
  • 3.3.1 National Public Spheres ``Europeanised?́́
  • 3.3.1.1 Dominance of EU Executive Institutions at the Costs of the European Parliament
  • 3.3.1.2 EU-Scepticism as an Indication of Europeanisation of Public Spheres
  • 3.3.1.3 Dominance of Political Elites, Lack of Visibility of Civil Society Actors
  • 3.3.1.4 National Frames of Reference and Cultural Differences Remain Relevant
  • 3.3.2 Politicisation of the European Public Sphere
  • 3.3.3 Deficits of Research
  • 3.4 The Internet and the Public Sphere
  • 3.4.1 The Democratic Potential of the Internet as a Public Sphere
  • 3.4.2 A New Landscape of Political Communication: A Public Sphere from Below?
  • 3.4.3 Deliberative Quality of Online Political Communication
  • 3.4.4 The Internet and the European Public Sphere
  • 3.5 Conclusion
  • 3.5.1 The EU Democratic Deficit in Times of Crisis
  • 3.5.2 The Internet and the European Public Sphere
  • References
  • Chapter 4: Experience with Digital Tools in Different Types of e-Participation
  • 4.1 Three Basic Functions of e-Participation
  • 4.2 Monitoring
  • 4.2.1 E-information
  • 4.2.2 E-deliberation
  • 4.3 Agenda Setting
  • 4.3.1 E-campaigning
  • 4.3.2 E-petitions
  • 4.4 Decision-Making
  • 4.4.1 E-consultation
  • 4.4.2 E-participatory Budgeting
  • 4.4.3 E-voting
  • 4.4.3.1 Legal Theory and Computer Science
  • 4.4.3.2 Socio-political Issues
  • 4.4.3.3 Socio-cultural Issues
  • 4.5 Experiences with e-Participation at EU-Level
  • 4.5.1 Deliberative Citizens ́Involvement Projects (DCIPs)
  • 4.5.2 E-consultation Instruments
  • 4.5.3 The European Citizens ́Initiative (ECI)
  • 4.5.3.1 Criticism
  • 4.5.3.2 Digital Support
  • 4.5.3.3 Points for Improvement
  • 4.5.4 E-Petitions of the European Parliament
  • 4.5.5 Summary
  • 4.6 Conclusions
  • 4.6.1 Experience with Digital Tools in Different Types of e-Participation
  • 4.6.2 Experiences with e-Participation at EU-Level.
  • References
  • Part II: Case Studies
  • Chapter 5: Introduction to the Case Study Research
  • 5.1 Evaluation Framework
  • 5.2 Data Collection
  • 5.3 Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)
  • References
  • Chapter 6: Parliamentary Monitoring
  • 6.1 Parliamentary Monitoring in the UK: TheyWorkForYou
  • 6.1.1 Introduction
  • 6.1.2 Participants
  • 6.1.3 Participatory Process
  • 6.1.4 Results
  • 6.2 Parliamentary Monitoring in Germany: abgeordnetenwatch.de
  • 6.2.1 Introduction
  • 6.2.2 Participants
  • 6.2.3 Participatory Process
  • 6.2.4 Results
  • References
  • Websites (All Accessed 10-10-2018)
  • Chapter 7: Informal Agenda Setting
  • 7.1 The Dutch e-Petition Case: Petities.nl
  • 7.1.1 Introduction
  • 7.1.2 Participants
  • 7.1.2.1 Representativeness
  • 7.1.2.2 Communication and Mobilisation Strategy
  • 7.1.3 Participatory Process
  • 7.1.4 Results
  • 7.2 The Finnish Citizens ́Initiative and the Open Ministry
  • 7.2.1 Introduction
  • 7.2.2 Participants
  • 7.2.3 Participatory Process
  • 7.2.4 Results
  • References
  • Websites (All Accessed 10-12-2018)
  • Chapter 8: Formal Agenda Setting (National and Local Level)
  • 8.1 Crowdsourcing for a New Constitution: Iceland
  • 8.1.1 Introduction
  • 8.1.2 Participants
  • 8.1.3 Participatory Process
  • 8.1.4 Results
  • 8.2 Future Melbourne Wiki: A Strategic City Vision by the Community
  • 8.2.1 Introduction
  • 8.2.2 Participants
  • 8.2.3 Participatory Process
  • 8.2.4 Results
  • 8.3 Predlagam.vladi.si in Slovenia
  • 8.3.1 Introduction
  • 8.3.2 Participants
  • 8.3.3 Participatory Process
  • 8.3.4 Results
  • 8.4 Participatory Budgeting in Berlin Lichtenberg
  • 8.4.1 Introduction
  • 8.4.2 Participants
  • 8.4.3 Participatory Process
  • 8.4.4 Results
  • 8.5 Internetconsultatie.nl
  • 8.5.1 Introduction
  • 8.5.2 Participants
  • 8.5.3 Participatory Process
  • 8.5.3.1 Lack of Interaction
  • 8.5.3.2 Interpretation of the Input.
  • 8.5.4 Results
  • References
  • Websites (Accessed 12-10-2018)
  • Chapter 9: Formal Agenda-Setting (European Level)
  • 9.1 European Citizens ́Initiative
  • 9.1.1 Introduction
  • 9.1.2 Participants
  • 9.1.3 Participatory Process
  • 9.1.4 Results
  • 9.2 Futurium
  • 9.2.1 Introduction
  • 9.2.2 Participants
  • 9.2.3 Participatory Process
  • 9.2.3.1 Digital Futures
  • 9.2.3.2 eGovernment4EU
  • 9.2.4 Results
  • 9.3 Your Voice in Europe
  • 9.3.1 Introduction
  • 9.3.2 Participants
  • 9.3.3 Participatory Process
  • 9.3.4 Results
  • 9.4 European Citizens ́Consultation
  • 9.4.1 Introduction
  • 9.4.2 Participants
  • 9.4.3 Participatory Process
  • 9.4.4 Results
  • References
  • Websites
  • Chapter 10: Non-binding Decision-Making
  • 10.1 The German Pirate Party
  • 10.1.1 Introduction
  • 10.1.2 Participants
  • 10.1.3 Participatory Process
  • 10.1.4 Results
  • 10.2 The Five Star Movement in Italy
  • 10.2.1 Introduction
  • 10.2.2 Participants
  • 10.2.2.1 Engagement and Communication Strategies
  • 10.2.3 Participatory Process
  • 10.2.4 Results
  • 10.3 Podemos in Spain
  • 10.3.1 Introduction
  • 10.3.2 Participants
  • 10.3.3 Participatory Process
  • 10.3.4 Results
  • 10.4 Participatory Budgeting in Belo Horizonte
  • 10.4.1 Introduction
  • 10.4.2 Participants
  • 10.4.3 Participatory Processes
  • 10.4.3.1 User-Friendliness
  • 10.4.3.2 Trust-Building (or Not)
  • 10.5 Participatory Budgeting in Paris
  • 10.5.1 Introduction
  • 10.5.2 Participants
  • 10.5.2.1 Communication and Mobilization Strategies
  • 10.5.3 Participatory Process
  • 10.5.3.1 Aggregation
  • 10.5.3.2 Deliberation
  • 10.5.3.3 Information on the Process
  • 10.5.4 Results
  • 10.6 Participatory Budgeting in Reykjavik (Betri Reykjavik)
  • 10.6.1 Introduction
  • 10.6.2 Participants
  • 10.6.2.1 Communication and Mobilization Strategies
  • 10.6.2.2 Representativeness
  • 10.6.3 Participatory Process
  • 10.6.4 Results.
  • References
  • Webpages
  • Chapter 11: Binding Decision-Making
  • 11.1 Green Primary
  • 11.1.1 Introduction
  • 11.1.2 Participants
  • 11.1.3 Participatory Process
  • 11.1.4 Results
  • 11.2 Voting in Elections in Estonia
  • 11.2.1 Introduction
  • 11.2.2 Participants
  • 11.2.3 Participatory Process
  • 11.2.4 Results
  • 11.3 Voting in Elections/Referenda in Switzerland
  • 11.3.1 Introduction
  • 11.3.2 Participants
  • 11.3.3 Participatory Process
  • 11.3.4 Results
  • References
  • Websites
  • Part III: Conclusions
  • Chapter 12: Assessing Tools for E-Democracy: Comparative Analysis of the Case Studies
  • 12.1 Introduction
  • 12.2 Assessment of the Different Conditions
  • 12.2.1 Combination of Online and Offline Participation
  • 12.2.2 Link to the Formal Policy or Political Process
  • 12.2.3 Sustainability
  • 12.2.4 Communication or Engagement Strategy
  • 12.2.5 Clarity on the Process
  • 12.2.6 Possibility to Interact with Other Participants
  • 12.2.7 Possibility to Interact with Decision-Makers
  • 12.2.8 Quantitative Aggregation
  • 12.2.9 Feedback to Participants
  • 12.3 Assessment of the Outcomes
  • 12.3.1 Impact on Final Decisions
  • 12.3.2 Impact on Policy or Political Agenda-Setting
  • 12.4 Analysis of Configurations
  • 12.4.1 Impact on Decision-Making
  • 12.4.2 Conclusions: How to Organise Impact on Decisions at a European Level
  • 12.4.3 Agenda-Setting
  • 12.4.4 Conclusions: How to Organise Impact on European Agendas
  • 12.5 In Sum: Digital Participation Is Not a Quick-Fix
  • References
  • Chapter 13: Options for Improving e-Participation at the EU Level
  • 13.1 EUś Institutional Architecture and the Need for e-Participation
  • 13.2 Challenges Specific to e-Participation at the EU Level
  • 13.2.1 Language
  • 13.2.2 Multilevel Governance
  • 13.2.3 Digital Divide
  • 13.3 Ways of Improving Existing Participatory Mechanisms.
  • 13.3.1 Improving the European Citizens ́Initiative.