European e-Democracy in Practice.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing AG,
2019.
|
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Series: | Studies in Digital Politics and Governance Series
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Click to View |
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Acknowledgements
- Contents
- About the Editors and Authors
- Chapter 1: Introduction
- 1.1 State and Perspectives of e-Democracy
- 1.2 Design of the Study and Layout of the Book
- References
- Part I: The State of Scholarly Discussions
- Chapter 2: E-Democracy: Conceptual Foundations and Recent Trends
- 2.1 Organisation and Theoretical Framework
- 2.1.1 Introduction of Basic Concepts
- 2.1.1.1 The Liberal Model of Democracy
- 2.1.1.2 The Republican or Participatory Model
- 2.1.1.3 The Deliberative Model of Democracy
- 2.1.2 The Concept and Definition of e-Democracy
- 2.1.3 Democracy-Related Potential of Information and Communication Technologies
- 2.1.4 Dimensions of e-Democracy
- 2.1.5 Participatory Democracy in European Union Legal Frameworks
- 2.2 Web 2.0 and Social Media: Threats and Promises for Democratic Discourse
- 2.2.1 Introduction
- 2.2.2 Key Tenets of the Debate About Social Mediaś Role in Political Communication
- 2.2.3 Redefining the Political Towards Personalised Politics?
- 2.2.4 Social Media and Their Potential Impacts on Political Participation
- 2.2.4.1 Social Media and Political Communication
- 2.2.4.2 Social Media and the Quality of Deliberation
- 2.2.4.3 Political Activism and Social Media
- 2.2.4.4 Political Consumerism
- 2.2.4.5 Social Media and Elected Representatives
- 2.2.4.6 Effects on Political Opinion and Behaviour: Inconclusive Results
- 2.2.5 Summarising the Perspectives
- 2.3 Conclusions
- References
- Chapter 3: E-Democracy and the European Public Sphere
- 3.1 Introduction
- 3.2 The Democratic Deficit of the European Union
- 3.2.1 Legitimisation of EU Politics in Times of Crisis
- 3.2.2 ``No Demos?́́ European Identity and Citizenship
- 3.2.3 Politicisation of Europe and European Citizenship
- 3.3 A European Public Sphere?.
- 3.3.1 National Public Spheres ``Europeanised?́́
- 3.3.1.1 Dominance of EU Executive Institutions at the Costs of the European Parliament
- 3.3.1.2 EU-Scepticism as an Indication of Europeanisation of Public Spheres
- 3.3.1.3 Dominance of Political Elites, Lack of Visibility of Civil Society Actors
- 3.3.1.4 National Frames of Reference and Cultural Differences Remain Relevant
- 3.3.2 Politicisation of the European Public Sphere
- 3.3.3 Deficits of Research
- 3.4 The Internet and the Public Sphere
- 3.4.1 The Democratic Potential of the Internet as a Public Sphere
- 3.4.2 A New Landscape of Political Communication: A Public Sphere from Below?
- 3.4.3 Deliberative Quality of Online Political Communication
- 3.4.4 The Internet and the European Public Sphere
- 3.5 Conclusion
- 3.5.1 The EU Democratic Deficit in Times of Crisis
- 3.5.2 The Internet and the European Public Sphere
- References
- Chapter 4: Experience with Digital Tools in Different Types of e-Participation
- 4.1 Three Basic Functions of e-Participation
- 4.2 Monitoring
- 4.2.1 E-information
- 4.2.2 E-deliberation
- 4.3 Agenda Setting
- 4.3.1 E-campaigning
- 4.3.2 E-petitions
- 4.4 Decision-Making
- 4.4.1 E-consultation
- 4.4.2 E-participatory Budgeting
- 4.4.3 E-voting
- 4.4.3.1 Legal Theory and Computer Science
- 4.4.3.2 Socio-political Issues
- 4.4.3.3 Socio-cultural Issues
- 4.5 Experiences with e-Participation at EU-Level
- 4.5.1 Deliberative Citizens ́Involvement Projects (DCIPs)
- 4.5.2 E-consultation Instruments
- 4.5.3 The European Citizens ́Initiative (ECI)
- 4.5.3.1 Criticism
- 4.5.3.2 Digital Support
- 4.5.3.3 Points for Improvement
- 4.5.4 E-Petitions of the European Parliament
- 4.5.5 Summary
- 4.6 Conclusions
- 4.6.1 Experience with Digital Tools in Different Types of e-Participation
- 4.6.2 Experiences with e-Participation at EU-Level.
- References
- Part II: Case Studies
- Chapter 5: Introduction to the Case Study Research
- 5.1 Evaluation Framework
- 5.2 Data Collection
- 5.3 Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)
- References
- Chapter 6: Parliamentary Monitoring
- 6.1 Parliamentary Monitoring in the UK: TheyWorkForYou
- 6.1.1 Introduction
- 6.1.2 Participants
- 6.1.3 Participatory Process
- 6.1.4 Results
- 6.2 Parliamentary Monitoring in Germany: abgeordnetenwatch.de
- 6.2.1 Introduction
- 6.2.2 Participants
- 6.2.3 Participatory Process
- 6.2.4 Results
- References
- Websites (All Accessed 10-10-2018)
- Chapter 7: Informal Agenda Setting
- 7.1 The Dutch e-Petition Case: Petities.nl
- 7.1.1 Introduction
- 7.1.2 Participants
- 7.1.2.1 Representativeness
- 7.1.2.2 Communication and Mobilisation Strategy
- 7.1.3 Participatory Process
- 7.1.4 Results
- 7.2 The Finnish Citizens ́Initiative and the Open Ministry
- 7.2.1 Introduction
- 7.2.2 Participants
- 7.2.3 Participatory Process
- 7.2.4 Results
- References
- Websites (All Accessed 10-12-2018)
- Chapter 8: Formal Agenda Setting (National and Local Level)
- 8.1 Crowdsourcing for a New Constitution: Iceland
- 8.1.1 Introduction
- 8.1.2 Participants
- 8.1.3 Participatory Process
- 8.1.4 Results
- 8.2 Future Melbourne Wiki: A Strategic City Vision by the Community
- 8.2.1 Introduction
- 8.2.2 Participants
- 8.2.3 Participatory Process
- 8.2.4 Results
- 8.3 Predlagam.vladi.si in Slovenia
- 8.3.1 Introduction
- 8.3.2 Participants
- 8.3.3 Participatory Process
- 8.3.4 Results
- 8.4 Participatory Budgeting in Berlin Lichtenberg
- 8.4.1 Introduction
- 8.4.2 Participants
- 8.4.3 Participatory Process
- 8.4.4 Results
- 8.5 Internetconsultatie.nl
- 8.5.1 Introduction
- 8.5.2 Participants
- 8.5.3 Participatory Process
- 8.5.3.1 Lack of Interaction
- 8.5.3.2 Interpretation of the Input.
- 8.5.4 Results
- References
- Websites (Accessed 12-10-2018)
- Chapter 9: Formal Agenda-Setting (European Level)
- 9.1 European Citizens ́Initiative
- 9.1.1 Introduction
- 9.1.2 Participants
- 9.1.3 Participatory Process
- 9.1.4 Results
- 9.2 Futurium
- 9.2.1 Introduction
- 9.2.2 Participants
- 9.2.3 Participatory Process
- 9.2.3.1 Digital Futures
- 9.2.3.2 eGovernment4EU
- 9.2.4 Results
- 9.3 Your Voice in Europe
- 9.3.1 Introduction
- 9.3.2 Participants
- 9.3.3 Participatory Process
- 9.3.4 Results
- 9.4 European Citizens ́Consultation
- 9.4.1 Introduction
- 9.4.2 Participants
- 9.4.3 Participatory Process
- 9.4.4 Results
- References
- Websites
- Chapter 10: Non-binding Decision-Making
- 10.1 The German Pirate Party
- 10.1.1 Introduction
- 10.1.2 Participants
- 10.1.3 Participatory Process
- 10.1.4 Results
- 10.2 The Five Star Movement in Italy
- 10.2.1 Introduction
- 10.2.2 Participants
- 10.2.2.1 Engagement and Communication Strategies
- 10.2.3 Participatory Process
- 10.2.4 Results
- 10.3 Podemos in Spain
- 10.3.1 Introduction
- 10.3.2 Participants
- 10.3.3 Participatory Process
- 10.3.4 Results
- 10.4 Participatory Budgeting in Belo Horizonte
- 10.4.1 Introduction
- 10.4.2 Participants
- 10.4.3 Participatory Processes
- 10.4.3.1 User-Friendliness
- 10.4.3.2 Trust-Building (or Not)
- 10.5 Participatory Budgeting in Paris
- 10.5.1 Introduction
- 10.5.2 Participants
- 10.5.2.1 Communication and Mobilization Strategies
- 10.5.3 Participatory Process
- 10.5.3.1 Aggregation
- 10.5.3.2 Deliberation
- 10.5.3.3 Information on the Process
- 10.5.4 Results
- 10.6 Participatory Budgeting in Reykjavik (Betri Reykjavik)
- 10.6.1 Introduction
- 10.6.2 Participants
- 10.6.2.1 Communication and Mobilization Strategies
- 10.6.2.2 Representativeness
- 10.6.3 Participatory Process
- 10.6.4 Results.
- References
- Webpages
- Chapter 11: Binding Decision-Making
- 11.1 Green Primary
- 11.1.1 Introduction
- 11.1.2 Participants
- 11.1.3 Participatory Process
- 11.1.4 Results
- 11.2 Voting in Elections in Estonia
- 11.2.1 Introduction
- 11.2.2 Participants
- 11.2.3 Participatory Process
- 11.2.4 Results
- 11.3 Voting in Elections/Referenda in Switzerland
- 11.3.1 Introduction
- 11.3.2 Participants
- 11.3.3 Participatory Process
- 11.3.4 Results
- References
- Websites
- Part III: Conclusions
- Chapter 12: Assessing Tools for E-Democracy: Comparative Analysis of the Case Studies
- 12.1 Introduction
- 12.2 Assessment of the Different Conditions
- 12.2.1 Combination of Online and Offline Participation
- 12.2.2 Link to the Formal Policy or Political Process
- 12.2.3 Sustainability
- 12.2.4 Communication or Engagement Strategy
- 12.2.5 Clarity on the Process
- 12.2.6 Possibility to Interact with Other Participants
- 12.2.7 Possibility to Interact with Decision-Makers
- 12.2.8 Quantitative Aggregation
- 12.2.9 Feedback to Participants
- 12.3 Assessment of the Outcomes
- 12.3.1 Impact on Final Decisions
- 12.3.2 Impact on Policy or Political Agenda-Setting
- 12.4 Analysis of Configurations
- 12.4.1 Impact on Decision-Making
- 12.4.2 Conclusions: How to Organise Impact on Decisions at a European Level
- 12.4.3 Agenda-Setting
- 12.4.4 Conclusions: How to Organise Impact on European Agendas
- 12.5 In Sum: Digital Participation Is Not a Quick-Fix
- References
- Chapter 13: Options for Improving e-Participation at the EU Level
- 13.1 EUś Institutional Architecture and the Need for e-Participation
- 13.2 Challenges Specific to e-Participation at the EU Level
- 13.2.1 Language
- 13.2.2 Multilevel Governance
- 13.2.3 Digital Divide
- 13.3 Ways of Improving Existing Participatory Mechanisms.
- 13.3.1 Improving the European Citizens ́Initiative.