Cover Image

Taking the EU to Court : Annulment Proceedings and Multilevel Judicial Conflict.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adam, christian.
Other Authors: Bauer, Michael W., Hartlapp, Miriam., Mathieu, Emmanuelle.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cham : Springer International Publishing AG, 2019.
Edition:1st ed.
Series:Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics Series
Subjects:
Electronic books.
Online Access:Click to View
Table of Contents:
  • Intro
  • Acknowledgements
  • Praise for Taking the EU to Court
  • Contents
  • About the Authors
  • Abbreviations
  • List of Figures
  • List of Tables
  • Chapter 1 The Neglected Politics Behind EU Annulment Litigation
  • Policy and Institutional Relevance of Annulments
  • Annulment Over Time and Across Policy Areas: Empirical Evidence
  • Structure of the Book
  • Cases Cited
  • References
  • Chapter 2 Towards an Analytical Framework to Study Annulments in the EU
  • Research Questions
  • Multilevel Governance and Conflict in the EU
  • EU Policy Making and Litigant Configurations
  • Judicial Politics and Judicial Success
  • Conceptualizing Multilevel Annulment Conflict
  • Horizontal v. Vertical Conflict
  • Simple v. Complex Conflicts
  • A Multilevel and Multi-step Analytical Approach
  • Cases Cited
  • References
  • Chapter 3 The Legal Background
  • Actions for Annulment: Some Essentials
  • An Evolving Set of Reviewable Acts
  • An Evolving List of Applicants
  • Conclusion
  • Cases Cited
  • References
  • Chapter 4 Studying Annulment Actions
  • Research Strategy
  • Case Selection
  • Data
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Chapter 5 Motivations: When Conflict Leads to Litigation
  • Conceptualizing Motivations for Litigation
  • Material Gains
  • Institutional Competences
  • Ideology
  • Political Trust
  • Empirical Analysis
  • The Legal Factor
  • Material Gains-Driven Motivation in Annulment Litigation
  • The Potato Starch Case (T-557/13)
  • Adjustment of Salaries and Pensions of Eurocrats (C-196/12, C-66/12, C-63/12)
  • Institutional Competences-Driven Motivation in Annulment Litigation
  • The Renewable Energies Law Case (T-134/14 and T-47/15)
  • The Leipzig Halle Case (T-396/08) and the Dresden Airport Case (T-215/09)
  • Procedural Competences in Trade Negotiations (C-22/70 and C-425/13)
  • The Selective Tax Benefits Cases (T-219/10, T-399/11).
  • Ideology-Driven Cases in Annulment Litigation
  • The EPSO and Patent Package Cases (T-148/13, T-149/13, T-191/13, C-274/11, C-147/13)
  • Passenger Rights (C-317/04 and C-318/04)
  • The Private Pension Market Case (C-57/95)
  • Political Trust-Driven Annulment Cases
  • Toy Safety Case (T-198-12)
  • The Molluscs Case (T-204/11)
  • BMW Case (T-671/14)
  • Conclusion
  • Cases Cited
  • References
  • Chapter 6 Litigant Configurations: Turbulence and the Emergence of Complex Configurations
  • Engaging with Complexity
  • Theorizing Complex Litigant Configurations
  • Complex Litigant Patterns in the Face of Institutional Turbulence
  • The Expanded Tobacco Case (T-170/03)
  • Spanish Coal Case (T-57/11)
  • Conclusion
  • Cases Cited
  • References
  • Chapter 7 Litigant Success: How Litigant Configurations Relate to Legal Outcomes
  • Litigant Configurations and Judicial Success: What We Know
  • Litigant Configurations and Endogeneity: A New Approach
  • Litigant Configurations and Legal Reasoning
  • Empirical Patterns of Litigant Configurations and Legal Success
  • Distributive Effects and Feedback of Winning or Losing a Case
  • Winning Can Be Aligned with Legal Success
  • Material Gains
  • Institutional Competences
  • Ideological and Policy Preferences
  • Winning Can Be Disconnected from Legal Success
  • Material Gains
  • Institutional Competences
  • Political Trust
  • Conclusion
  • Cases Cited
  • References
  • Chapter 8 The Political Side of EU Annulment Litigation
  • The Motivations Behind Annulment Actions
  • Actor Configurations in Annulment Conflicts
  • Success, Failure, and Feedback Effects
  • Beyond the State of the Art: How Explaining Annulment Cases Challenge Common Research Perspectives
  • References
  • Correction to: Taking the EU to Court.
  • Correction to: C. Adam et al., Taking the EU to Court, Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21629-0
  • Annexes
  • References
  • Index.

Similar Items