Deliberative Public Engagement with Science : An Empirical Investigation.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing AG,
2018.
|
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Series: | SpringerBriefs in Psychology Series
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Click to View |
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Acknowledgments
- Contents
- About the Authors
- Chapter 1: The Big Picture
- 1.1 Introduction
- 1.2 Motivating Questions and Gaps
- 1.2.1 What Works? Delineating Important Public Engagement Types and Variables
- 1.2.2 For What Purposes? Assessing Engagement Effectiveness and Success
- 1.2.3 In What Contexts and Why? From Comparison to Causation
- 1.3 Advancing the Theoretical and Empirical Bases of a Science of Public Engagement
- 1.3.1 The Current State of Theory
- 1.3.2 Moving Forward
- 1.4 Focus and Overview of the Rest of this Book
- References
- Chapter 2: Specific Methods
- 2.1 Connecting Features, Processes, and Outcomes During Deliberative Discussions
- 2.2 Our Context: Future Scientists Deliberating About Nanotechnology over Time
- 2.2.1 Participants: College Students in the College Science Classroom
- 2.2.2 Discussion Topics: Nano-Biological Technologies and Human Enhancement
- 2.2.3 Repeated Measures Longitudinal Design
- 2.3 What Works? Experimentally Varied Deliberative Engagement Features
- 2.3.1 Importance of Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) Topics in Science Education
- 2.3.2 Characteristics of the Background Information
- 2.3.3 Prompts for Cognitive Engagement
- 2.3.4 Peer Discussion
- 2.3.5 Active Facilitation During Discussion
- 2.4 For What Deliberative Engagement Outcomes?
- 2.4.1 Knowledge
- 2.4.2 Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology
- 2.4.3 Perceptions of Actors: Nanoscientists and Policymakers
- 2.4.4 Policy Scenario: Policy Preference, Acceptance, and Support
- 2.4.5 Motivational Variables
- 2.4.6 Evaluation of Public Engagement
- 2.5 How and Why: Mediators and Moderators
- 2.5.1 Cognitive-Affective and Behavioral Engagement
- 2.5.2 Self-Reports of Influences on Attitudes
- 2.5.3 Participant and Facilitator Perceptions of Group-Relevant Processes.
- 2.5.4 Assignment and Information Evaluations
- 2.5.5 Written Reponses and Comments
- 2.5.6 Data Quality Checks
- 2.5.7 Demographics and Individual Differences
- 2.6 Conclusion
- References
- Chapter 3: Knowledge
- 3.1 Why Does Knowledge Matter?
- 3.2 How Can Public Engagements Foster Increases in Knowledge?
- 3.2.1 Informational Presentation
- 3.2.2 Cognitive Engagement
- 3.2.3 Forms of Cognitive Engagement
- 3.2.4 Need for Cognition
- 3.3 What Do We Mean by Knowledge?
- 3.4 What Did They Learn?
- 3.5 What Mediates Knowledge?
- 3.6 Summary and Conclusion
- References
- Chapter 4: Attitude Change and Polarization
- 4.1 Introduction
- 4.2 The Effects of Deliberation: Unification or Polarization?
- 4.2.1 The Promises of Public Deliberation: Informed, Enlightened Consensus
- 4.2.2 Deliberation's Downfalls: Motivated Reasoning and Polarization
- 4.3 What Works, for What Purposes, Under What Conditions, and Why?
- 4.3.1 For What Purposes?
- 4.3.2 What Works, Under What Conditions, and Why?
- 4.4 Results
- 4.4.1 Attitude Change over Time
- 4.4.2 Encouraging Critical Thinking
- 4.4.3 Information Format
- 4.4.4 The Effects of Group Discussion
- 4.4.5 The Features of Group Discussion: Homogeneity and Facilitator Activity
- 4.4.6 A Potential Moderator of Homogeneity
- 4.5 Conclusion: What We Have Learned and Where to Go from Here
- References
- Chapter 5: Policy Acceptance
- 5.1 Introduction
- 5.2 A Rough Draft Theory of Policy Preference, Acceptance, and Support
- 5.2.1 For What? Definitions and Relationships Between Some Key Variables
- 5.2.2 What Works and How? Prior Research and Theory Concerning Factors Impacting Policy Acceptance and Support
- 5.3 The Current Study
- 5.3.1 The Policy Scenarios
- 5.3.2 Key Variables
- 5.4 Analyses and Results
- 5.4.1 Simple Correlations.
- 5.4.2 (1) Do Our Experimental Manipulations Impact Policy Acceptance/Support or Moderate the Policy Preference-Acceptance/Support Relationship?
- 5.4.3 (2) Do Our Experimental Manipulations Impact Potential Mediators?
- 5.4.4 (3) Do Our Mediators Impact Policy Acceptance/Support or Moderate the Preference-Acceptance/Support Relationship?
- 5.5 Summary and Conclusions
- References
- Chapter 6: Conclusion and Future Directions
- References
- Index.