On the Welfarist Rationale for Relative Poverty Lines
The theory and evidence supporting a relativist approach to poverty measurement are critically reviewed. Various sources of welfare interdependence are identified, including the idea of "relative deprivation" as well other (positive and...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/01/8962513/welfarist-rationale-relative-poverty-lines http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6466 |
Summary: | The theory and evidence supporting a
relativist approach to poverty measurement are critically
reviewed. Various sources of welfare interdependence are
identified, including the idea of "relative
deprivation" as well other (positive and negative)
welfare effects for poor people of belonging to a better-off
group. An economic model combines informal risk sharing
with the idea of a "positional good," and
conditions are derived in which the relative deprivation
effect dominates, implying a relative poverty measure. The
paper then reviews the problems encountered in testing for
welfare effects of relative deprivation and discusses the
implications of micro evidence from Malawi. The results are
consistent with the emphasis given to absolute level of
living in development policy discussions. However, relative
deprivation is still evident in the data from this poor but
unequal country, and it is likely to become a more important
factor as the country develops. |
---|