Proposals for WTO Reform : A Synthesis and Assessment
This paper summarizes the major arguments and proposals to reform the modus operandi of the World Trade Organization --including decision-making procedures, negotiating modalities, and dispute settlement. Much has already been done to improve the i...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20110110095113 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3298 |
Summary: | This paper summarizes the major
arguments and proposals to reform the modus operandi of the
World Trade Organization --including decision-making
procedures, negotiating modalities, and dispute settlement.
Much has already been done to improve the internal and
external transparency of World Trade Organization processes.
Some proposals for structural reform ignore incentive
constraints and the fact that the World Trade Organization
is an incomplete contract that must be self-enforcing.
Others -- such as calls for a "critical mass"
approach to negotiations --can already be pursued (and have
been). The agenda for international cooperation increasingly
revolves around "behind-the-border" regulatory
externalities that do not necessarily lend themselves to
binding commitments in a trade agreement. This suggests a
focus on strengthening notification/surveillance and
developing more effective mechanisms for dialogue on
regulatory policies that may create negative spillovers. |
---|