The Role of Local Institutions in Adaptation to Climate Change
This review focuses on the role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. It does so under the belief that climate impacts will affect disadvantaged social groups more disproportionately, and that local institutions centrally influence...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/234591468331456170/The-role-of-local-institutions-in-adaptation-to-climate-change http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28274 |
Summary: | This review focuses on the role of local
institutions in adaptation to climate change. It does so
under the belief that climate impacts will affect
disadvantaged social groups more disproportionately, and
that local institutions centrally influence how different
social groups gain access to and are able to use assets and
resources. It suggests that adaptation to climate change is
inevitably local and that institutions influence adaptation
and climate vulnerability in three critical ways: a) they
structure impacts and vulnerability, b) they mediate between
individual and collective responses to climate impacts and
thereby shape outcomes of adaptation, and c) they act as the
means of delivery of external resources to facilitate
adaptation, and thus govern access to such resources. In
focusing on local institutions, the review fills two glaring
gaps in the existing understanding about institutions and
climate change: the lack of middle-range theories of
adaptation practices to help frame policy debates, and the
absence of comparative empirical studies of adaptation to
support policy interventions. To contribute to middle-range
theoretical knowledge about climate change the review
develops a conceptual framework to understand and classify
the adaptation practices of the rural poor, view the
institutional structuring of adaptation, and examine the
types of external support interventions that local
institutions inevitably channel. The review proposes a focus
on different forms of mobility, storage, diversification,
communal pooling, and market exchange in rural settings as
the basic mechanisms through which households address
riskiness of livelihoods. Using the familiar typology of
public, private, and civil society institutions the review
proposes an institutional linkages framework that highlights
the role of institutional partnerships in facilitating
adaptation and drawing from social network analysis it
presents a conceptual toolkit to analyze institutional
partnerships and their impacts on resource access of
vulnerable social groups. In examining the role of
institutions in channeling financial, information and
technological, leadership, and policy interventions into
rural areas, the review highlights that institutions are
critical leverage points through which to determine the
direction and magnitude of flows of resources to different
social groups. |
---|