Deals and Delays : Firm-level Evidence on Corruption and Policy Implementation Times

This paper examines whether demands for bribes for particular government services are associated with expedited or delayed policy implementation. The "grease the wheels" hypothesis, which contends that bribes act as speed money, implies t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Freund, Caroline, Hallward-Driemeier, Mary, Rijkers, Bob
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2014
Subjects:
WEB
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/06/19736799/deals-delays-firm-level-evidence-corruption-policy-implementation-times
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19375
Description
Summary:This paper examines whether demands for bribes for particular government services are associated with expedited or delayed policy implementation. The "grease the wheels" hypothesis, which contends that bribes act as speed money, implies three testable predictions. First, on average, bribe requests should be negatively correlated with wait times. Second, this relationship should vary across firms, with those with the highest opportunity cost of waiting being more likely to pay and face shorter delays. Third, the role of grease should vary across countries, with benefits larger where regulatory burdens are greatest. The data are inconsistent with all three predictions. According to the preferred specifications, ceteris paribus, firms confronted with demands for bribes take approximately 1.5 times longer to get a construction permit, operating license, or electrical connection than firms that did not have to pay bribes and, respectively, 1.2 and 1.4 times longer to clear customs when exporting and importing. The results are robust to controlling for firm fixed effects and at odds with the notion that corruption enhances efficiency.