The Relative Income and Relative Deprivation Hypotheses : A Review of the Empirical Literature
The paper provides a review of the empirical literature in economics that has attempted to test the relative income hypothesis as put forward by Duesemberry (1949) and the relative deprivation hypothesis as formalized by Runciman (1966). It is argu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/09/18263952/relative-income-relative-deprivation-hypotheses-review-empirical-literature http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15825 |
Summary: | The paper provides a review of the
empirical literature in economics that has attempted to test
the relative income hypothesis as put forward by Duesemberry
(1949) and the relative deprivation hypothesis as formalized
by Runciman (1966). It is argued that these two hypotheses
and the empirical models used to test them are essentially
similar and make use of the same relative income concept.
The review covers the main intellectual contributions that
led to the formulation and tests of these hypotheses, the
main formulations of the utility and econometric equations
used in empirical studies, the main econometric issues that
complicate tests of the hypotheses, and the empirical
results found in the literature. The majority of studies
uses absolute and relative income together as explanatory
factors in utility models and finds absolute income to have
a positive and significant effect on utility (happiness).
The majority of studies also finds relative income to be a
significant factor in explaining utility but the sign of
this relation varies across studies. The source of this
variation is complex to detect given that few results are
directly comparable across studies because of differences in
model specifications. |
---|