Hungary : Corporate Governance Country Assessment
This report assesses the corporate governance policy framework and enforcement and compliance practices in Hungary. Hungary has already invested considerable resources in upgrading its legislation to meet European Union Directives, and the legislat...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/02/6733339/hungary-report-observance-standards-codes-rosc-corporate-governance-country-assessment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15709 |
Summary: | This report assesses the corporate
governance policy framework and enforcement and compliance
practices in Hungary. Hungary has already invested
considerable resources in upgrading its legislation to meet
European Union Directives, and the legislative and
regulatory framework dealing with corporate governance
issues is robust. The major issues identified by this review
include: (1) the general weakness of the supervisory board,
which causes some non-compliance with several OECD
Principles; and (2) a conflict between law and practice in
the area of share registration, particularly the problems
related to the ability of all shareholders to attend
meetings and exercise their voting and other rights.
Strengths and weaknesses are highlighted, and the policy
recommendations made may be grouped under three categories:
legislative reform, institutional strengthening, and
voluntary/private initiatives. The report recommends
creating a "share registration working group" to
synchronize law and practice in the area of shareholder
record keeping and voting. It also makes recommendations to
be implemented as part of a Company Law update. Finally, the
report promotes private sector initiatives and capacity
building to build on legislative progress on corporate
governance reform. It recommends developing a Hungarian
corporate governance code of best practice, which would
address key issues to include supervisory board roles and
institutional investor responsibilities. The report also
proposes that an Institute of Directors be created train
supervisory board members, disseminate best practice, and
promote dialogue between the public and private sectors.
Together, these measures give issuers the choice to
implement best practice and investors a benchmark against
which to measure corporate governance in Hungary. |
---|