Why Is Voluntary Financial Education So Unpopular? Experimental Evidence from Mexico
Take-up of voluntary financial education programs is typically extremely low. This paper reports on randomized experiments around a large financial literacy course offered in Mexico City to understand the reasons for low take-up, and to measure the...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/05/17692433/voluntary-financial-education-so-unpopular-experimental-evidence-mexico http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15580 |
Summary: | Take-up of voluntary financial education
programs is typically extremely low. This paper reports on
randomized experiments around a large financial literacy
course offered in Mexico City to understand the reasons for
low take-up, and to measure the impact of financial
education. It documents that the general public displays
little interest in such courses and that participation is
low even among individuals who express interest in financial
education. The paper experimentally investigates barriers to
take-up, and finds no impact of relaxing reputational or
logistical constraints and no evidence that time
inconsistency is the reason for limited participation. Even
relatively sizeable monetary incentives get less than 40
percent of interested individuals invited to training to
attend. Using a randomized encouragement design, the authors
measure the impact of the course on financial knowledge and
behavior. Attending training results in a 9 percentage point
increase in financial knowledge and a 9 percentage point
increase in saving outcomes, but no impact on borrowing
behavior. Administrative data indicate that the savings
impact is relatively short-lived. The results suggest people
are making optimal choices not to attend financial education
courses, and point to the limits of using general purpose
courses to improve financial behavior for the general population. |
---|