Making Up People : The Effect of Identity on Preferences and Performance in a Modernizing Society
It is typically assumed that being hard-working or clever is a trait of the person, in the sense that it is always there, in a fixed manner. However, in an experiment with almost 600 boys in India, cues to one's place in the traditional caste...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/10/16816808/making-up-people-effect-identity-preferences-performance-modernizing-society http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12068 |
Summary: | It is typically assumed that being
hard-working or clever is a trait of the person, in the
sense that it is always there, in a fixed manner. However,
in an experiment with almost 600 boys in India, cues to
one's place in the traditional caste order turn out to
influence the expression of these traits. The experiment
assigned students to different treatments with respect to
the salience of caste and had them solve mazes under
incentives. It turned out that making caste salient can
reduce output by about 25 percent, which is equivalent to
twice the effect on output of being one year younger. The
channels through which this occurs differ by caste status.
For the upper castes, the decline in performance under piece
rates can only be explained by a shift in preferences
regarding the provision of effort. When the ascriptive caste
order is cued, upper-caste individuals may think, "I
don't need to excel." In contrast, for the lower
castes, which were traditionally "untouchables,"
publicly revealing caste identity impairs the ability to
learn and may lead individuals to think, "I can't
(or don't dare to) excel." This paper provides a
measure of the impact that ascriptive, hierarchized
identities can have on preferences and performance after a
society -- in its public pronouncements and legislation --
has adopted norms of equality in a formal sense. The
findings are important because they suggest that when
contexts cue identities founded on the superseded rules of a
hierarchical institution, the effects on human capital
formation and development can be first-order. Contexts that
make traditional identities salient are an underemphasized
source of impediments to institutional change. |
---|